Re: [IRCA] Fake DX Recordings
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Fake DX Recordings



I read the following e-mail and two thoughts immediately come to mind:

1)  Due to the extra effort usually involved in spotting forgeries/fakes 
    of any sort, if fake DX recordings can so easily be spotted, shouldn't 
    genuine audio files be easier to spot?

2)  Since he started off his e-mail by saying that this particular 
    DXer's report was found to be valid, then why delay sending this 
    DXer a QSL due to the problem with fraudelent reports sent by others?

I suspect the real reason is, as states elsewhere here in the forum, is 
that he's simply too busy to respond to QSL requests, which is truly understandable.

73,
    
J.D. Stephens

> 
> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:39:22 +0000
> From: Nick Hall-Patch
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of
> America
> <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [IRCA] Fwd: [mwcircle] QSLs: A worrying comment
> 
> from Steve Whitt on the Medium Wave Circle list:
> 
> >I guess many of us find webstreams helpful in
> identifying DX signals we are
> >listen to, but sadly other people are finding the
> webstreams beneficial for
> >other less ethical purposes....
> >
> >
> >I spotted the following in Distance magazine.
> >
> >
> >" I have received your QSL requests, and find them valid. Probably 9 
> >out of 10 QSL requests these days are bogus, and I haven't figured 
> >out how to handle it yet. A large number of the audio clips I
> >get are our web stream audio, with static and noise dubbed over.
> >When I find an easy way of verifying the audio source,
> I will resume replying to QSLs, sorry you
> >are stuck in the middle.
> >Tracy Teagarden
> >Chief Engineer



      
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx