Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA TP's for 10-20... More Fun

[D1028Gary@xxxxxxx]

John, Bruce, Nick and Others,
 
When reviewing the 6-minute long MP3 of the 1170 kHz mix (HLSR, UnID  
Chinese and KPUG) recorded on the 9' box loop this morning, there was  a Mandarin 
Chinese female voice prior to the Chinese music, mixing  with with KBS 
(HLSR) and KPUG. All three stations are easily  audible during a 3-minute 
stretch of the MP3, which I'll send to you  all privately (and to anyone else who 
is interested).
 
I'll listen again on 1170 kHz tomorrow, but when conditions are good these  
three stations seem to be of roughly equal strength, and unpredictable in  
who will dominate the frequency (kind of like 1134 kHz, with KBS, JOQR and  
CNR1).
 
73, Gary  
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 10/20/2009 1:49:29 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
bjohnorcas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

Fellas,

CNR1 was running an hour long music program this morning  starting at 
about 1403... not classical opera, at least when I was  listening. It 
was more an Asian pops program. I think that it was an hour  long.

John Bryant







At 07:14 PM 10/20/2009  +0000, you wrote:
>At 18:43 10/20/2009, you wrote:
> >Hi  Nick,
> >
> >Yes, I remember the discussion over Walt's  initial 1170 Chinese MP3 
made at
> > 1358 on 9-9, in which the  Chinese dialect was clearly identified here 
as
> >Mandarin, not  Cantonese. I believe that Bill Harms also mentioned that 
VOA
> >would  have a Cantonese program at the time of Walt's recording, not
>  >Mandarin. From what I recall, the conclusion was that Walt was not  
> receiving
> >VOA-Phippines, in that September 9 MP3.
>  >
> >This morning the 1170 Chinese station format sounded very  much like the
> >typical CNR1 programming (with Chinese music), but  the signal 
> dipped below  a
> >loud KBS signal before  any check could be made of a parallel. I don't 
know
> >if  VOA  Philippines would play Chinese music or not during their 
Cantonese
>  >program,  but Bruce's recent Grayland report mentioned CNR1 mixing  
> with KBS on
> >1170, both  over KPUG. The Chinese  station received this morning is  
still
> >an UnID mystery, and  will be investigated more here in the  next few 
days.
>  >Meanwhile, I have my own 1170 mix MP3 of both TP's,  winning the  
> battle over
> >KPUG
>
>OK, thanks  Gary.   I recall that discussion now, but thought at that  
>time KBS w/CC as scheduled was likely (and a couple of weeks later  
>heard at sea myself w/ KBS ID).   Of course at this later  time, KBS 
>is supposed to be in Korean according to  WRTH.
>
>It will be interesting to see what you track down, as I  was hearing 
>CC type talk myself this morning on that channel, but  didn't stop to 
>figure out if it might be Cantonese or standard Chinese  (not being 
>an expert in such matters).  But CNR1 on that channel  would be new 
>for me also, and I didn't hear it at  Grayland.
>
>best  wishes,
>
>Nick
>
>
>
>*****************************
>Nick  Hall-Patch
>Victoria,  BC
>Canada
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA  mailing  list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions  expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>original  contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
>the IRCA,  its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more  information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message:  irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA  mailing  list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions  expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
original  contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, 
its  editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information:  http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message:  irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx