[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] C.Crane SWP Ultralight Radio
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] C.Crane SWP Ultralight Radio
- From: "Powell E. Way III" <w4opw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:38:56 -0800 (PST)
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx designates 72.14.176.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; domainkeys=hardfail (test mode) header.From=w4opw@xxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=i29uOAIEbRTbFIpouUx44Rtkdmr6PfPeQwMZ025Q7Y6R7gppvlXgCydhEuMk6H50GnSlct7wRZX0/fa5NFsGuKBnHEGIemsK/R00MhSkqirS+hMAsAjroN5pG2EtA6mQgOjswNicStNWNCZ8WkmPtI/DEuAcPN+1cHxTvGMXGHM=;
- Domainkey-status: bad (test mode)
I find my CC SWP as sensitive as any of the ultralights I have. Not nearly as selective, but one feature it has is FAR better audio than the Sangean DT-400W.
The Sangean has a pronounced lack of proper bass response. And the speaker sounds much better than the one in the Sangean.
Powell
NNNN
POP email is powell at backroads DOT net
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx