[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Day Power vs Night Power
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Day Power vs Night Power
- From: "Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:41:07 -0600
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx designates 72.14.176.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@xxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=j7hCDNDAFyTHJIgy0wxbqesscMu0Qzb8g33Xi48NcJg=; b=YEd0S4t1BFYgn6QRCr330dvBjU2vYmpvvmPsDpZ3tgBL40ZqoJRbk6LIhvvd7IRhhl jjwaLU/DnguqaltyEYxNz6o7VZMaYiEypzUkyywZDZPcnb9sjb2l1ciXtiBRG00uaqcE 8vfUMqQNDPZFG+FROhOjN8r2bwaTM0N0By/0U=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=xA6dffcgwlUEXLc3bPOF+VWFS26XN4dUzEDwhRnRUJGEeWpGfEOpvfNhPWlPRGi2k3 fmmr4Xddr0YfRho/L2Ei24oLyxzghW1aiBmtySMttcyS+se64OGZyAVXYv5Q39RLH1tD I/a6LJYTF27qR8fOwqi91KgzG6Y9qftBXyYKk=
I have one case of an "offender" being handled between two stations where I
was involved personally. While our station wasn't being interferred with, we
were the ones that caught it and made a polite phone call.
I was working for a Class C AM in New England, while in the car with my boss
late one night coming back from Walmart, we caught an 2 tower, 5KW Daytimer
on the air wellll past sunset. The Am just simulcasted an FM sister.
My boss called up the station from our studio while I was sitting there and
the person on the other end actually ended up getting snotty with us.... the
phone call ended and about 1 minute later, the offending station had signed
off.
With respect to what Scott said, it really depends on what Field office and
Field Agent you talk to. The ones I deal with, I know what they look for.
Paul Walker
www.onairdj.com
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Scott Fybush <scott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Patrick Martin wrote:
>
>> Paul,
>>
>> Inotherwords what you are saying is, the chances of a station using day
>> power at night being caught, is about the same chances of a person
>> winning the lottery.
>>
>
> I can't speak for Paul and his field office friends, but the odds are much
> better of being caught than of winning the lottery.
>
> In recent years, the FCC has issued as many as 30 or 40 Notices of Apparent
> Liability for day power/pattern at night - and that's not counting the
> informal warnings that a field agent might issue to a station that's
> otherwise in compliance.
>
> Figure that there are, what, 5000 AM stations in the country - but several
> thousand of those are class C graveyarders that use the same facility day
> and night, while a hundred or so more are ND-U or DA-1 class A or B signals
> with the same day and night power.
>
> That leaves maybe 2000-2500 class B and D signals that could potentially
> cheat and be caught...and if even 20 or 30 or those get nailed with a fine
> each year ($1500 at minimum, usually more), those are actually decent odds.
>
> Remember, too, that a lot of these cases are handled internally before they
> ever get to the FCC. A certain DA-N AM signal that's near and dear to me is
> plagued by a co-channel class D in a neighboring state with a bad habit of
> leaving its full day power running all night. When the problems recur, a
> phone call to the offending station usually takes care of things.
>
> One more note: the FCC field offices handle many matters other than
> catching AM cheaters. Most of their work is outside the broadcast arena,
> handling interference to government and business radio services and other
> such matters.
>
>
> s
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx