[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] QSL request
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] QSL request
- From: "Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:33:09 -0500
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx designates 72.14.176.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@xxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=cIdEIMKWkStN+X5lL9v+Y8j48A3zkNU3io4xW4AJV5E=; b=vinvG/jhQ794dyRXDDQKMri/tawEPckcaAVd7eNAPPkvyNXtf4TwdZCcn6b+bT2isW IPT9uGSbmbacTakTQPZ7BXK+AOlLto4QGtz9EH73ekOcZJ//jZv+CLOSvvEzlYb/8CSC LFWvdqnpMy2Kj8342J2MnFKLiQN7xg3F+15Uo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=nvMGlEGOVO5juin+yDctpbvgukItqXLzxx3aaDNbh/uM9RxeUd4nO7+XuBh/Yj++SQ c+ugFje08LCoA+dw1SCm/wQsFv9baGImCCdaCAtC8h1x2A4pMtmFKGPvVqs9xEU1RhiT dz+CCR/TtWiHTc+BvLD7R+WryAn3vfJQKe6o8=
Steve,
I will try an answer your question from a broadcasters point of view. I have
a general understanding of RF and FCC stuff.
When you see a station's licensed power listed, it is almost always for a
1/4 wave tower. When I was at WQMA 1520, our tower was 150 feet which is 1/4
wave for 1520 Khz. If the tower is taller then 1/4 wave, it is therefore
more efficent then it needs to be.
If a tower is more efficent (taller then required) then you don't need quite
as much power to make the same coverage area that a slightly shorter tower
would produce.
Most stations elect for 1/4 wave towers, much much cheaper to build.
Paul Walker
www.onairdj.com
P.S. I think Powell would even agree I explained this one well.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Steve Ratzlaff <steveratz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> As an AM TX and general domestic AM dummy, what does all this mean, about
> not being able to put a 1kW signal into some type of tower? What does the
> power and or tower have to do with not being able to feed full power into
> the antenna?
> Steve
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul B. Walker, Jr." <
> walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" <
> irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 9:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] QSL request
>
>
> There was an AM not far from me at WABV, that was on a Class C Channel and
>> supposedly had a 5/8 wave tower.. and put the full 1KW into the tower.
>>
>> Glad we could try and help!
>>
>> Paul Walker
>> www.onairdj.com
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Craig Healy <bubba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >wrote:
>>
>> The station that received the QSL is WNBH-1340 in New Bedford, MA. The
>>> report came from Finland. There have been a few reports from Scandinavia
>>> in
>>> the past few years.
>>>
>>> WNBH is a bit of an anomoly in that it has a tall tower, yet puts the
>>> full
>>> kilowatt into in. No power cutback to make it an equivalent
>>> kilowatt/quarter wave tower. On vacation on Monhegan Island off the
>>> coast
>>> of Maine I could hear WNBH if I nulled the other pests. It does get out
>>> well.
>>>
>>> Thanks to all for the ear work!
>>>
>>> Craig Healy
>>> Providence, RI
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
--
Sincerely,
Paul B. Walker, Jr.
www.onairdj.com
walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx