Re: [IRCA] Engineers’ Group Has an Idea: Move AMs to Channels 5 & 6
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Engineers’ Group Has an Idea: Move AMs to Channels 5 & 6



This would be a great idea! In the past the NAB has resisted the idea of making a digital broadcast band in this channel 5 and 6 spectrum range, ostensibly because the NAB viewed it unfair to have all broadcasters on an equal footing (or so I understand). I wonder if things have changed.

Bill

Bruce Portzer wrote:
From Radio World Newsbytes dated 1 August 08.


It’s a dramatic idea that would change infrastructure reaching back to the very roots of our industry.

A group made up primarily of broadcast consulting engineers proposes a new use for TV Channels 5 and 6 in the United States once their occupants migrate to digital. It recommends the reallocation of part of that spectrum for the use of the country’s AM stations.

The group, calling itself the Broadcast Maximization Committee, recommends the conversion and migration of all AM stations over an extended period of time and with digital transmissions only.

It also proposes relocating the LPFM service to a portion of this spectrum and expanding the NCE service into the adjacent portion.

The group made its proposal in a filing to the FCC as part of the broadcast diversity proceeding (Docket 07-294). Comments in that proceeding were due this week. Other organizations also have used the proceeding to discuss how the radio spectrum should be structured; but these comments are likely to draw new attention to the plight of AM stations and possible ways to help the occupants of the senior band.

Engineering Consultant John Mullaney, a proponent of using Channels 5 and 6 for radio, is part of BMC. Noting that similar proposals to use that space for radio stations have been dismissed by the commission as premature until the DTV transmission is done, the group says the time is ripe for this proposal.

Although LPFMs and NCE stations would benefit, AMs would gain the most, the group contends. The proposal would move virtually all AM stations to the new band.

The engineers lay out a plan under which all or most of the current AM occupants would move and parts of the existing band would be designated for users like municipalities and LPAM stations.

“For clear-channel (Class A) AM stations we are proposing that the FCC will increase existing protections on the AM band and possibly re-allocate the Class As that stay in such a way that they will have enough protection from other AM stations so that they can operate HD Radio day and night without creating interference,” BMC member Bert Goldman told Radio World.

“This reduction in AM noise will allow the remaining Class A stations to increase their daytime and nighttime interference-free service by removing all other AM stations.”

Each channel is anticipated to be structured in such a way that the station may decide if they want greater robustness of signal (and greater coverage like in rural locations) or less robustness and up to four program channels. BMC is not proposing a digital standard at this time.

BMC has also proposed a way to move the estimated 24 post-transition DTV stations out of Channels 5 and 6.

The proposal is signed by Mullaney, Goldman, Mark Lipp, Paul H. Reynolds, Joseph Davis, Clarence Beverage, Laura Mizrahi, Lee Reynolds and Alex Walsh.

More details of the migration idea are here <http://www.radioworld.com/pages/s.0100/t.14795.html>.
_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx