Re: [IRCA] Review of Sony EX5, CCRadioPLus and GE SRII published

[Bruce Portzer <bportzer@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Panyu is a district southeast of Guangdong and north of Hong Kong and 
Macao.  If that's where the test was done, then the signal reports could 
sort of make sense assuming:
- some of the Guangdong transmitters such as 648 and 1062 might be north 
or west of the city and therefore not as strong as some of the other 
locals (or possibly the person tested the radio forgot to rotate it for 
max signal).  I have no idea if this is the case.  648 and 1062 are both 
listed as 150 kw, which should be enough to smoke the front end of the 
radio unless they're quite far from Panyu
-990 could be a freq change for the Guangdong station on 990, or a typo, 
or an unlisted relay of something
-747 could be the station I have listed in Zhongshan, which is close to 
Panyu
-738 would the Macao station, with strength similar to the ones from 
Hong Kong.
-603 would be the Guangdong station I have listed in the PAL

An interesting list in any case

Bruce


satya@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hey Pete:
>
> Google translation of the text says "Three of the PK is the location of
> the receiving environment in the electromagnetic Panyu District of
> Guangzhou City Qifuxincun" - I think that's where the shoot-out took
> place?
>
> 73 - Kevin S.
> Bainbridge Island, WA
>
>
>
>
>   
> > This is in response to the URL (http://hkradioer.googlepages.com/
> > 3mwkings) provided to the list by satya@sounddsl. The source is
> > "HKRadioer" and on the web site comparing the three radios, a band
> > scan of signal strengths is provided for one of the sets:
> > 567    2
> > 603    5
> > 621    1
> > 648    2
> > 675    2
> > 702    2
> > 738    2
> > 747    5
> > 756    3
> > 783    1
> > 828    1
> > 846    1
> > 864    1
> > 900    1
> > 927    2
> > 981    1
> > 990    4
> > 1017    1
> > 1044    2
> > 1062    2
> > 1098    3
> > 1134    1
> > 1170    5
> > 1206    2
> > 1215    2
> > 1287    1
> > 1422    0
> > 1521    0
> >
> > My guess is that these readings were taken in Shenzhen rather than
> > Hong Kong since (1)  the HK frequencies (567 621 675 783 863 and
> > 1044) are hardly anything to behold and (2) Shenzhen is listed on 747
> > in the PAL and is very strong. I don't see Guangzhou (listed) coming
> > at at a 5 on 603 and 990 is anybody's guess. Ah, to be over there
> > again and listen to them first hand...
> >
> > Pete Taylor
> > Tacoma, WA
> > 12225w 4719n
> > HQ180 + Kiwa air core loop
> > ICF2010 + "     "    "      "
> > DX398; Palomar loop
> > SRF-59 & SRF M37V
> >     
>
>   

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx