Re: [IRCA] TPs from Vancouver Island on June 22: no poorer than usual, which has lately been pretty poor
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] TPs from Vancouver Island on June 22: no poorer than usual, which has lately been pretty poor



At 11:10 AM 6/22/2008, you wrote:

>>
>
>Got ambitious this morning, and listened from 1145 to 1225UT.  More time does not necessarily equal more DX.
>
>Most interesting in the "what the DX would be if there was any DX" stakes, was a fair strength carrier on 1566 before 1200UT, that seemed Asiatic (best on the northerly Flag)....so HLAZ is still trying to make an appearance pretty much right at summer solstice.
>
>The best carrier strengths here were 738 and 1098, with 1475 putting in a reasonable appearance also.   1386 and 1503 showed signs of life, and there were a large number of weaker carriers.  Managed three (apparently) DU audios: 702 at 1205UT, 792 at 1209UT, and 774 at 1215UT.   All were deeply in the murk, and required a bit  of preamplification to be sure these weren't imaginary.   
>
>Interestingly, sometimes these signals were better on the 1m square ALA100 copper pipe loop than on the westerly Flag, in spite of not having the Flag's attenuation off the back end. 
>
>best wishes,
>
>Nick


Further monitoring of 774 indeed revealed English audio at 12:00 for me and building a bit for a few minutes beyond.  Sure enough, audio was better on 792 with ABC jingle at 12:00.  702 had nothing at 12:00, but when I forwarded to 12:03 there was the same English audio again.  Say, this is easy fellas.....you guys provide the frequencies and times, and I then check them at my leisure!  In any case, signals were never better than a very weak 7, and otherwise mostly 6's........Walt.


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx