Re: [IRCA] Wince-worthy IBOC praise article

[Milspec390@xxxxxxx]

Here's an experiment to test validity of 90s' insipid dismissal of facts as 
mere 'different opinion' -
 
Disclaimer: Consult competent counsel prior to experimenting. 
 
1. Acquire transmitter.
 
 2.Light up transmitter.. Patch loud pink noise into audio & push the thing 
to the max.
 
3. When FCC arrives, tell them interference laws are merely a matter of 
'opinion'.
 
4. When they confiscate transmitter, state your opinion that they are 
'unfair'.
 
5. When they fine you, tell them money looks best in your pocket, not theirs, 
in your view.
 
 
It's not merely the jamming, it'sTeamBLOC's overblown interference denials 
and recititation of conflicting, shifting stories when unable to deny unlawful 
interference, coupled with no discernable listener benefits, that have turned 
everyone off.

Coverup finished Richard Nixon. Seem's it's slowly doing the same for 
TeamBLOC.
 
next, comes the interminable years of lingering noise emissions from spiteful 
iBLOC boosters, followed by cheerleaders' inevitable blame shifting. 
 
Old story.
 
                                           paul vincent zecchino
 
manasota key fl
 



**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes 
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx