[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] FCC Again Loosens Media Ownership Concentration Rules
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] FCC Again Loosens Media Ownership Concentration Rules
- From: Scott Fybush <scott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:56:37 -0500
Russ Edmunds wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071218/media_nm/mediaownership_fcc_dc
From a radio point of view, this really isn't the headline out of
today's FCC hearing. The real lead story is a whole package of new
proposed regulation that the FCC will lay out in more detail in January.
Some of the pieces will include a proposed requirement that all stations
staff their main studios 24/7, which sounds great in theory but has some
serious logistical issues in practice. (Any of us who've admired the
unique programming Bob Bittner does on WJIB 740 and WJTO 730 should
realize that there's no way he could offer that service if he had to
staff both stations' studios around the clock.)
There are other proposals in here that also look good on paper but would
be a bear to implement. Anyone who remembers the old days of community
ascertainment boards at radio stations knows what a farce that process
often (usually? always?) was. Now the FCC's hoping to bring it back
after 23 years. It'll be great for the lawyers. I can't imagine it'll do
a thing for quality radio.
There's yet another proceeding out of the FCC today that seeks to
prevent advertisers from refusing to place their ads on stations that
cater to minority listeners. That's a distasteful practice, to be sure,
but there are some serious First Amendment issues being stomped on with
this proposal.
In the end, the whole meeting today (including the TV/newspaper
crossownership piece that made all the headlines) will likely turn out
to be moot. Congress has already made it clear that it intends to
overturn any attempt the FCC makes to lift the crossownership ban,
probably as soon as tomorrow. And the rest of the votes today were all
compromises by the current chairman, Kevin Martin, to push the
crossownership item through. They're likely to fade back into the
woodwork once crossownership is overturned...or so pretty much every
broadcast station owner I know is hoping.
(I'm hearing yelping and howling about some of the proposed new radio
rules from both the very biggest groups and the very smallest of
broadcasters.)
s
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx