[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IRCA] Looks like CFAB-1450 Windsor NS will on on AM for a while longer
- Subject: [IRCA] Looks like CFAB-1450 Windsor NS will on on AM for a while longer
- From: Deane McIntyre <dmcintyr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:59:58 -0700
The application of CFAB-1450 Windsor NS to move to FM was approved some
time ago under the condition that they find an alternative to the
technical parameters they had applied for (92.9 MHz, 47.1 kW)
They then proposed 92.9 at 23.8 kW, which has now been denied by the
CRTC. So this
graveyarder will be around for a while longer at least. Perhaps with
CHUC-1450 gone CFAB will be easier to log for those in the northeast.
<http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisions/2007/db2007-424.htm>
Use of frequency 92.9 MHz by the new FM radio station in Windsor
The Commission denies the application by Maritime Broadcasting System
Limited
to operate its new English-language FM radio programming undertaking
in Windsor,
Nova Scotia, at 92.9 MHz (channel 225C1) with an average effective
radiated power of 23,800 watts.
Introduction
1.
The Commission received an application by Maritime Broadcasting
System Limited
(MBS) to operate its new English-language FM radio programming
undertaking in
Windsor, Nova Scotia, at 92.9 MHz (channel 225C1) with an average
effective
radiated power (ERP) of 23,800 watts.
2.
The applicant filed this application further to the Commission’s
direction in
Broadcasting Decision 2006-644 in which the Commission stated that it
would only
issue a licence for this station provided that the applicant
submitted, within
three months of the date of that decision, an amendment to its
application
proposing new technical parameters that are acceptable to both the
Commission
and the Department of Industry.
73,
Deane McIntyre VE6BPO
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx