Re: [IRCA] Poor Excuses kill this hobby
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Poor Excuses kill this hobby



Having caught up on my e-mails after a very enjoyable
holiday, I read with great interest through the "Poor
excuses" thread started by Mr. Rychalsky.  

Which prompts me to wish everyone a Happy
Thanksgiving, good DX, and say that the below is a
total load of crap!

73 - J.D. Stephens


> From: Konnie Rychalsky <dxbox87@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [IRCA] Poor Excuses kill this hobby
> 
> Jim,
>  
> With all due respect, you are a ham radio operator,
> and the reference at the bottom of your recent post
> ( QRZ.com ) does an excellent job at  "defining"
> what a QSL is, unless you have redefined it.  I in
> no way suggested that you insist upon the
> testing-station that you educate them, but come on
> now.... you "ARE" a ham radio operator.... and
> wouldn't it help to a) when you ask a station to run
> a test, ask them if they have a QSL available, b) if
> not, offer one, and c) it would be nice to let us
> know?????  Ham radio operators know what QSLs are,
> and no news to you I'm sure.  Aren't you of all
> people suppossed to encourage the hobby of radio? 
> Doesn't Ham radio include QSLs???
>  
> To everyone on this list, are you implying that even
> if you do coordinate a DX test, it's possible a QSL
> will not be issued?  If indeed possible, isn't it
> worth asking?  Most QSLs I receive from stations are
> from those who were or currently are Ham radio
> operators.  I will remain gratefull with a "QSL."  I
> include a friendly letter with my reports showing
> examples of QSLs, even on an idea for a quick
> make-shift QSL if the station doesn't have one [and
> I'll add I've received phonecalls in return stating
> they were interested.]  Maybe if you'll ask, you'll
> be surprised on the answer, and therefore help the
> station and the hobby.  The reason for hearing a
> distant station is to have your reception confirmed,
> as proof, and that is done via a QSL card.  Somehow,
> coordinating a test and not checking into a QSL
> response just falls short to the "hobby" that began
> long before you or I were even born.  To settle for
> less, doesn't help the hobby.  Personally, anything
> less is just that, !
>  something less.
>  
> I believe your response has lead me to question if
> it is worth staying up, or getting up, to listen to
> a test anymore.  Who's suppossed to share the DX &
> QSL with the station, if the test coordinator
> doesn't?  Don't you think that if a station will not
> issue a QSL, we should know that ahead of time?  I
> cannot find your explanation to ask, or educate,
> adequatly helps the hobby.
>  
> A fish is a fish, a worm is a worm, and a QSL is a
> QSL.  As for "these days" one of the problems of
> receiving less than a QSL just may be found in your
> response.  Maybe instead of a stamp, each DXer can
> send in a dollar, and with the $10 - $20, you can
> supply the station with a gift...uh, QSL cards!!!!!!
> about 100 worth.  You will have left the hobby a
> better place than you found it.
>  
> Then, dxers will be gratefull to you and the IRCA
> for making a difference.  What is the IRCA for
> anyway?  And coming from a Ham radio operator
> ????????????
>  
> God, that was simple.  People, stop settling for
> less, and poor excuses.  Get involved in your hobby!
>  Stop looking for what you can get, and add
> selfishly to a raggetty old shoe box full of mold
> and mildew stuck in a closet that won't see light
> for another ten years... and starting looking on how
> to give to others, including an education on what a
> QSL really is, and supply them.  There needs to be a
> serious attitude shift here.  That should start the
> keyboards clicking, eh?
>  
> Konnie
> SW CT


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better sports nut!  Let your teams follow you 
with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7ntAcJ
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx