Re: [IRCA] It's more than IBOC..

["Mike Westfall, Lost Almost NM" <mwdx@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Implied easment by prescription beyond the NIF, due to historical and
continuous skywave listenership.

Interesting.

I wonder how that would play out in a court of law?


On 10/9/07, Craig Healy <bubba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> Third, a group of small station operators get together and file a lawsuit
> against IBOC interference to their signals.  People have had the right to
> listen to non-local stations since radio was invented.  IBOC removes that.
> The parallel is to real estate.  When a property is used for decades by
> someone who is not the owner, a certain adverse possession right gradually
> is created.  Courts have recognized this for a long time.  Why is the
> ability to listen to non-locals any different?  Don't we have an adverse
> possession right here?  I hope a court can be made to see that and act
> appropriately against IBOC, the FCC and it's proponents.
>
>
-- 
Mesa Mike
LA de NM
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx