[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] WOR and IBOC
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] WOR and IBOC
- From: Barry McLarnon <bdm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:56:56 -0400
On Tuesday 18 September 2007 11:39, Marc DeLorenzo wrote:
> Bill has raised some excellent questions. Unfortunately, I don't have
> answers but rather more questions. According to Barry's list,
> http://topazdesigns.com/iboc/station-list.html, WLW IS running at IBOC at
> night. Is this not true? If WLW is running IBOC at night, I believe they
> will cause more interference to WOR than WGN will because they are closer
> to NYC. Anyway, as Bill mentioned, the real issue is will WOR receive
> IBOC interference within it's NIF. I'm sure Tom Ray is taking
> measurements.
You're right about WLW, they do have it on... more about that below, but let's
take a step back first.
I have to ask: why all the focus on WOR? Yes, Tom Ray has made himself the
poster child for AM IBOC, but the question of whether or not they suffer from
IBOC interference is not the crucial issue here. An interesting issue to be
sure, but not the crucial one. The folks at WOR obviously had a good idea of
what to expect from nighttime IBOC, and they decided they could live with it.
But WOR's situation is atypical for several reasons, and the fact that they've
decided to tolerate some additional interference is, to me, not really
relevant to the situations of all the other affected stations out there. For
one thing, WOR gets creamed fairly badly by a high power Cuban station, and
they can't do anything about it. So, they likely already have a relatively
high NIF contour value... certainly worse than the average Class A, anyway.
The higher the current NIF, the less impact that IBOC interference will have.
The saving grace for WOR is the huge population base within a short distance
of their transmitter. The bottom line is that they've made a business
decision that any loss in coverage is more than offset by being able to offer
a digital service (of course, they severely miscalculated the potential
popularity of HD radio, but that's another story).
Anyway, back to the WOR numbers... I calculate the field strength (10%
skywave, for you technorati) of WGN at WOR to be 1.33 mV/m. However, WLW is
even stronger, at 1.91 mV/m. Between the two of them, I arrive at an
effective NIF value of 14.8 mV/m. In other words, the hiss should start to
be noticeable around WOR's 15 mV/m contour. I would further speculate that
it would become very annoying at around the 5 mV/m contour. I don't know how
this would compare with the current co-channel interference from Cuba,
though. I would think that it has to have some impact on their useful
coverage, but I doubt if we'll get the straight goods on that from the WOR
folks!
In any case, there are many other stations out there that have more to lose
from IBOC interference than WOR, methinks.
Barry
--
Barry McLarnon VE3JF Ottawa, ON
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx