Re: [IRCA] This 1 to 10 rating system

[vroomski@xxxxxxxxxxx]

On the paper I received from John Bryant the first five numbers are various levels of het.  Five " How come they aren't putting through audio" Six is "Threshold audio so weak that you can tell the gender, but not follow the conversation."  Seven is "Could ID the language, but not follow the conversation."  Eight is "Could follow the conversation entirely, if I could speak the langauage." Nine is "Arm-chair copy." Never used a 10 on a TP, though HLAZ -1566 from a 2,000 NW beverage at Grayland on a great morning is probably a "10."

I used  6 threshold, faint, very weak, weak. 7 fair 8 good 9 excellent 10 I'm lying.  

Dennis,
Vancouver, WA
-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Neil Kazaross" <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 

> Soemone please explain it to me !! 
> 
> I think a 1 is a barely detectable carrier and a 6 is barely audible 
> audio..but please please explain it to me !! 
> 
> 73 KAZ 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> IRCA mailing list 
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
> editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx