[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] More coax experiments
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] More coax experiments
- From: Rick Kunath <k9ao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 01:42:14 -0400
Patrick Martin wrote:
> There might be a difference, but it might be so small not to notice it.
> When I get some Quad RG6, I can do an A/B test. I guess I should put a
> regular coax fitting on the plastic boxes. It would be easier as the
> short wires the banana plugs are on I am sure have pick up.
A coax fitting on a plastic box won't do the trick. You'll still have
ingress.
The box would have to be metal. If you can't do a metal box, try a
sleeve-type choke balun in addition to the existing matching transformer.
Don't know about direct burial quad. It isn't usually used for that
purpose. If we needed that kind of shielding, we'd always bury hardline.
Might be some out there though. I don't know what the pricing
differential would be of copper quad-shield coax vs. direct burial
aluminum small hardline these days.
Rick Kunath
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx