Re: [IRCA] longwire antennas

["Bob Young" <youngbob53@xxxxxxx>]

I presently have two insulated #12 400' LW's going through all sorts of 
trees and they work fine. I just run them through the trees only attached at 
the ends. At my old location I had a 75' LW in the clear and then ran a 450' 
LW though trees over a swamp etc, and I got all sorts of TA's with this 
antenna, the increase in signal strength over the 75' LW (and my 4' loop) 
was phenominal,

Bob Young
Analog, MA


>From: "WILLIAM J. BROOKS" <wwbrooks@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of 
>America<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [IRCA] longwire antennas
>Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 09:03:08 -0400
>
>greetings,
>                my rx station is located on a steep, heavily-wooded 
>hillside.
>                i am presently using a coaxial endfed, #12 ga., insulated 
>copper
>longwire about 150ft.in length and about 20ft.above grade.it is oriented
>in a sw-ne heading.i work the bcb exclusively for western u.s. stations.
>                i would like to increase the length and height but i am at 
>the
>limit of open space.in order to do this i would either have to cut much 
>brush
>and slay several trees (not preferred) or attach the insulated wire 
>tree-to-tree
>(preferred) which would then permit a dramatic increase in height and 
>length.
>                question:
>                              would there be a sacrifice in performance if 
>i chose the
>                              tree-to-tree route? i have not seen a great 
>deal written
>                              on the use of insulated copper longwires in 
>this application
>                              unless as a beverage.
>                              is this concept worth considering, or should 
>i be content
>                              with my 150ft. wire? i could easily extend 
>the length to 300-
>                              400ft.in this manner.and probably another 
>15-20ft.in height.
>
>                  any comments would be greatly appreciated.
>
>                  73's   bill brooks
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
>IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx