Re: [IRCA] IBAC vs IBOC

["Bob Young" <youngbob53@xxxxxxx>]

If any broadcast pros read this or any other medium wave DX reflector I 
think that they probably realize we know a lot more than they want anyone to 
know about the actual reception problems of this complete and utter failure 
and probably can't stand the term IBAC because the truth hurts, especially 
when you are in complete denial. IBAC actually describes the fatally flawed 
techology they are using much better than IBOC, because it is not In Band On 
Channel, it is In Band Adjacent Channel. We are the canaries in the coalmine 
and anyone with any money invested in this lead balloon sham certainly is 
going to try to discredit us in any way they can, especially when it hasn't 
exactly been a smashing success to put it mildly.

Bob Young
Analog, mA
KB1OKL

Even worse, I can see how this could cause certain people to
>simply dismiss DXers as a bunch of illiterate backwoods folks
>complaining about something whose real name we don't even know. Don't
>forget that a lot of broadcast professionals see what goes out on this
>reflector. Let's knock off the IBAC slang. It's kind of silly and it's
>making us all look bad.
>
>Patrick Griffith, Westminster CO
>Broadcast Technician
>NRC Broadcasting - Denver
>http://community.webtv.net/N0NNK/
>http://community.webtv.net/AM-DXer/
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
>IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx