Re: [IRCA] Compact Fluorescents
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Compact Fluorescents



--- Dan Strassberg <dan.strassberg@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> In response to my assertion that the sale or use of incandescent
> lamps would
> never be outlawed in the US (but might be taxed heavily to
> "encourage" the
> use of CFLs), Russ Edmonds wrote:
> 
> *** Don't be so sure. It doesn't take a legislative move. Neither the
> House nor Senate ever voted to take away analog television, but it's
> going away just the same
> ---
> 
> Sorry, I can't agree with that conclusion either; it's a HUGE stretch
> to get
> from analog TV to incandescent bulbs. Now, however, you MIGHT be able
> to
> make the case that the FCC would outlaw HD Radio because the
> receivers
> consume so much energy! R-i-i-i-ght!
> 
>

*** My point was that if the Federal Government chose to ban
incandescent bulbs in favor to CFB's in the name of energy efficiency.
it could do so without anyone in Congress having to vote. The example
of analog TV was but one of many. I see no reason to retract that. 

Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
FM: Yamaha T-80 & Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Hammarlund HQ-150 & 4' FET air core loop

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx