[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)
- From: Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
--- Gerry Bishop <gerryb4991@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Watch batteries don't, generally, shatter on contact with a kitchen
> floor.
>
> Perhaps someone can explain to me why these bulbs are "better" than
> incandescent bulbs?
>
>
*** The consensus seems to be that they last far longer and consume far
less energy because they are more efficient. The big question though is
just how much of a drop in the bucket of overall energy consumption
would this be ? If it's only 1-2% in the aggregate, then it'll probably
take mandates.
I haven't any flourescents in my home for obvious reasons. But I also
have no 100-watt nor 75-watt incandescent bulbs in regular use. I have
a couple of 75's in dark areas of the basement, but they don't get much
use.
Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
FM: Yamaha T-80 & Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Hammarlund HQ-150 & 4' FET air core loop
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx