[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] 1510 MT.Lake Terrace WA.
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] 1510 MT.Lake Terrace WA.
- From: bportzer@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 04:15:21 +0000
My 1968 KURB QSL letter said they had nulls towards KGA and "a Canadian station" (presumably CKAY-1500), with the main lobe aimed south. I was never at the KURB/KKZU/etc transmitter site and haven't been to KCIS's night time site. I don't think they're the same site, but I could be wrong.
I'm pretty sure KCIS started nighttime operation before the 1510 station went dark as KKZU. That wouldn't have precluded a diplexing arrangement, though I don't know how easy or hard it would be to diplex 630 with a figure 8 aimed east-west, with 1510 aimed south with nulls to the E and NW, using three towers (tower height at such disparate frequencies for one thing might make it a bit challenging). Maybe one of our radio engineers can hazard a guess.
Even if they didn't ever share the facility, it would still be tough getting towers sized for 1510 kHz to work well at 630, so I suspect KCIS doesn't use the old KURB et al site.
Bruce
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "ejs4@xxxxxxxxx" <ejs4@xxxxxxxxx>
> All,
>
> Something I have always wondered about: Is the nighttime transmitter
> site for KCIS 630 Edmonds actually the old 1510 Mountlake Terrace
> facility?
>
> Eric Svajdlenka
> KA7MEK
> Everett, WA
>
> --- Patrick Martin <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Bill,
> >
> > KURB, KKZU, etc had to protect KGA. They were directional West and
> > hardly covered their city. They were 250w as I remember. Bruce
> > Portzer
> > knows more about the station than I do as we used to to talk about
> > their
> > poor coverage.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > Patrick Martin
> > KAVT Reception Manager
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> > the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
> editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx