Re: [IRCA] Another perspective on AM IBOC, from the broadcasters' mailing list

[Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Patrick Martin <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Scott,
> 
> Very interesting. So it sounds (If I am correct?) that a
> communications
> receiver could be built to solve our IBOC issues? I asked that
> question
> a couple of times early on with the IBOC discussion along with a
> noise
> blanker to take it out and several responded saying it could not be
> done. So I dropped that thought. Well, maybe just maybe one of the
> receiver manufacturers could take this issue on. 
> 


*** I am not so sure. The writer seemed to bounce around the subject in
such a way that I found it difficult to determine which interference
problems he was suggesting a solution for; whether his solution
contemplated the current hybrid mode, an all-digital scenario or
something else. It appeared to me that he wasn't really addressing the
adjacent channel interference, but rather something else, but I'm still
not sure. I don't have any knowledge in the area of receiver design, so
part of it lost me completely.



Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
FM: Yamaha T-80 & Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Hammarlund HQ-150 & 4' FET air core loop


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for earth-friendly autos? 
Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx