Re: [IRCA] A idea for future DX Tests.....

[Brandon Jordan <brandon@xxxxxxxx>]

Charles A Taylor wrote:

> This is getting harder and harder to swallow. Are we MW BCB DXers trying to 
> log a broadcast station, or are
> we would-be hams logging stations through "special effects.?"

Is there a right, or proper, answer to your question? What if one is a 
bit of both?

Respectfully, I'm really missing where this is an issue. We are already 
IDing DX Tests via CW and sweep tone "special effects". All I am talking 
about is adding a few extra-slow IDs to a test for the segment of folks 
interested in really digging into the noise floor and extracting 
conclusive IDs. Doesn't effect the normal flow of a test, doesn't effect 
the purist 'it ain't logged until I hear a voice ID' folks. Simply, as 
in easily for all involved, adds an extra dimension to the DX Tests for 
those interested.

Best 73,

Brandon Jordan
Memphis, TN
www.bcdx.org
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx