[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IRCA] Observations on Scott Fybush's rebuttal
- Subject: [IRCA] Observations on Scott Fybush's rebuttal
- From: Charles A Taylor <MWDXer@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:17:15 -0500
Scott,
Your rebuttal deserves to go into IRCA Reprints!
Charles
-----
Charles A Taylor, WD4INP
Greenville, North Carolina
>With all due respect...what in the world are you trying to say?
>
>If a station's been dark for over 12 months, it no longer has a license
>as a matter of law. There's no asset to sell.
>
>Yes, there's such a thing as "stick value." Yes, there are people out
>there crazy enough to bid ridiculous amounts of money for new FM
>construction permits that won't ever be anything more than rimshots in
>overcrowded markets, or AM signals with 50 kW days, 230 watts at night,
>aimed out at sea. That's nothing new. There's always been a "greater
>fool" out there. (If there weren't, a certain high-powered AM in Rhode
>Island would have gone dark years ago.)
>
>And yes, there are some broadcasters - national religious networks,
>mainly - whose only interest is in the "sticks" they're acquiring. They
>buy the stations, shut down the local studios, and plug into the
>satellite. They can make it work because they're operating on a
>completely different financial model, based primarily on listener gifts.
>(That's still, thankfully, a very small percentage of commercial station
>sales.)
>
>You seem to believe that when an existing licensee goes to sell his
>station, an FCC auction is somehow involved. That is not the case.
>Existing radio stations are sold the same way they've always been - by
>private contract between buyer and seller, as a multiple of annual
>revenue. Do anything to disrupt that revenue stream (like, say, going
>off the air for a week at a time when the community desperately needs
>information) and you've diminished the value of that station, at least
>in the short term.
>
>My credentials on this? I advise broadcasters on station sales and
>acquisitions, including pricing.
>
>Here's a real-life example: a cluster of stations in a medium-sized
>market is currently for sale. Two of the stations are class B (50 kW)
>FMs with substantially identical signals. If what you say is true, those
>two stations should be valued identically. News flash: they're not,
>because one has declining revenue with a format that's hard to sell,
>while the other one has a solid revenue base and strong ratings in an
>advertiser-friendly demographic. Station B is going for twice as much as
>station A, and it'll be worth every penny to the right buyer.
>
>By the way, outside of the biggest markets, station values are actually
>on a downward swing. Clear Channel just checked out of northern New
>Hampshire and Vermont at a sale price that was several million dollars
>less than they paid for those stations in 1999-2000. Galaxy
>Communications lost a couple of million dollars on the stations it just
>sold in Albany. The last couple of rounds of FCC auctions for new
>construction permits have fallen short of expectations, too, as bidders
>from the earlier rounds discover just how much they overpaid for
>marginal facilities.
>
>They're not getting the big bucks you think they are for those stations,
>because - wait for it, now - station buyers need to be able to make a
>business case to justify paying a certain price for a station. In usual
>practice, that means taking out a loan, which has to be repaid. And
>how's that done? Yup, by selling a certain amount of advertising, which,
>last I checked, only works well when a station is ON THE AIR and
>broadcasting programming that an audience wants to hear and that can be
>sold to advertisers.
>
>Without that, all you've got is a piece of paper and a big bank loan to
>repay somehow. Good luck with that.
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx