[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] recorded the iboc
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] recorded the iboc
- From: Scott Fybush <scott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 01:21:06 -0500
cafe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> That sounds... awful underneath.
> Great recording BTW.
>
> wow.
Yes, it does - but again, that's with a Sony SRF-A100, one of a very,
very tiny number of AM stereo radios that use an envelope detector that
can't deal with the quadrature modulation that AM IBOC uses.
This is NOT in any way typical of what an average listener tuned to KGO
would be hearing. If there are a half-dozen listeners in KGO's local
area using the A100 or a similar radio, more than 20 years after they
were last sold, I'd be stunned.
Perhaps when my local 50 kW IBOC blaster, WHAM, turns the HD back on in
the morning, I'll pull out a sampling of more typical radios (along with
my Carver TX11b, which has a similar envelope detector to the Sony) and
record what it sounds like.
Again, none of this should be construed as an endorsement of AM IBOC,
about which I'm still skeptical - just a plea that if DXers want our
concerns about the technology to be taken seriously in the larger
engineering community, we have to be realistic about our concerns. This
recording, while an accurate reflection of what the A100 sounds like
when tuned to an IBOC signal, is NOT representative of what the average
analog listener will hear. If it were, there's not an AM station
anywhere that would be running the system in the first place.
s
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx