[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] New MW QSL
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] New MW QSL
- From: Charles A Taylor <MWDXer@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:46:14 -0500
Good work, Patrick.
Ha Noi is actually two words, as is Sai Gon.
Charles
At 02:33 PM 2/14/2007 -0800, you wrote:
>675 VIETNAM, Hanoi, finally after report after report and e mails, I
>finally sent out two reports last Fall, one for SW (6175 khz) and one
>for 675 Home Service in the same emvelope. I fiqured I would at least
>get the SW QSL. Low and behold, I went to the post office today and
>enclosed was a QSL card with both frequencies, 675 and 6175 khz. The
>time and date matches my 675 khz Home Service (1559 UTC Oct 23), so at
>least I can count it! This is not a new country for me QSL'd as I QSL'd
>them on 1010 khz back in 1984.
>I think they are just not set up to verify Domestic MW reports I guess.
>They seem to QSL their regional services on SW and their FS on MW, as
>they did with the 1010 freq. I still have a report out for 549 kHz. That
>remains to be seen if I get a QSL on that one. Maybe another dual report
>again, I might do. No V/S, and the address: 37 Ba Tieu, Ha Noi Vietnam
>(Hanoi, is spelled that way "Ha Noi" on the emvelope, but Hanoi on the
>card. This took about 100d. But I am sure pleased with this. (PM-OR)
>
>Patrick Martin
>KAVT Reception Manager
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----
Charles A Taylor, WD4INP
Greenville, North Carolina
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx