Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] Re: "HD" DX?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] Re: "HD" DX?



--- Paul Crankshaw <paulc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Can I ask a question about HD in the US?
> 
> Here in Europe the noise from the few stations
> running digital radio on 
> medium wave kill the band +/- 10 kHz.
> 
> I assume there are a relatively large number of HD
> stations in the US. 
> Do you suffer the same problems with the noise
> generated by digital 
> stations?
> 
> Paul



+ /- 20 kHz  or so


Powell



 
> 
> 
> Neil Kazaross wrote:
> 
> >One wonders when more stations will wake up and
> realize that no one but Ibequity cares about HD on
> AM and that the concept of mixing HD with analog
> doesn't work on AM.  
> >
> >73 KAZ ...Ibocington IL
> >  ----- Original Message ----- 
> >  From: Milspec390@xxxxxxx 
> >  To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> >  Cc: am@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> >  Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 9:09 PM
> >  Subject: [NRC-AM] Re: [IRCA] "HD" DX?
> >
> >
> >  Right, Barry -
> >
> >     And a good sync detector and/or filter and
> offest tuning will just as effectively eliminate
> co-channel ix without all of iBuckwitty's
> side-benefits: swine-like power consumption, heat
> emission - always good for surrounding components -
> as well as 'downloadable iBLOC software upgrades',
> and of course - 
> >
> >     licensing fees for all. 
> >
> >  What a marvelously fascistic pile of lies is HD.
> Thank you, holeigarchs. Thanks, Feckless Chamberpot
> of Cronies. 
> >
> >                                                   
>                                     z
> >
> >  pvz
> >  manalog key, fl
> >
> >
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >IRCA mailing list
> >IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list
> are those of the original contributors and do not
> necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
> editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> >To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list
> are those of the original contributors and do not
> necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
> editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx