[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] WD2XSH/10 Logged
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] WD2XSH/10 Logged
- From: "Steve Ratzlaff" <steveratz@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:38:01 -0800
(Working my way thru unread emails--a little late, but here's some info on
your question. I too sent /10 Dexter in NC my report from last night.) So
what you heard were non-beacon CW exchanges between two of the 500kc
stations. Apparently I tuned in later, when /10 was back to his canned
beacon message, at its slower speed.
Steve
"Steve,
Thanks for the DX report! Last night was very productive with both
reception
reports and QSOs. I had about a half hour QSO with each of three stations,
/5,
/6 and /23. That was the initial QRS with /23, Warren K2ORS. He is also on
137
khz and we have QSOed on that band also. Of course it was much easier on
500 khz.
73,
Dex, W4DEX, WD2XKO, WD2XSH/10"
----- Original Message -----
From: "saulamdx" <saulamdx@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] WD2XSH/10 Logged
>I heard two stations doing lengthy code. It was a bit
> too fast for me to copy... but I maay set up a tape
> recorder if tonight's DX is less than stellar. Just
> curious ... what in general are they saying ... seem
> to be giving more than calls. Are they talking?
> Saul / Burnt River ON
>
> --- Bob Young <youngbob53@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I've gotten a two of them so far, they were both
>> fairly close though, most
>> of the CW is slow, one guy was so qwuick (repeater)
>> it took me two hours to
>> decipher it. I sent in reports on their web page,
>>
>> Bob young
>> Milllbury, Ma
>> R-390A/2 400' LW's/Misek Phaser
>>
>>
>> >From: "Steve Ratzlaff" <steveratz@xxxxxxxx>
>> >Reply-To: Mailing list for the International Radio
>> Club of
>> >America<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club
>> of
>> >America"<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >Subject: Re: [IRCA] WD2XSH/10 Logged
>> >Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:59:20 -0800
>> >
>> >Nice reception for your first 500kc station! Next,
>> try for /20 in Oregon.
>> >He's extremely strong here, and on 505.650 kHz.
>> He's been heard in Hawaii
>> >and all over NA.
>> >
>> >/10 is coming in here tonight as well, weak; I've
>> heard it before. Solid
>> >copy for the full message tonight, almost no
>> fading. He's on 507.000 kHz.
>> >Nice slow CW.
>> >Steve
>> >NE Oregon
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "David Hochfelder" <xxmugginsxx@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club
>> of America"
>> ><irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 10:12 PM
>> >Subject: [IRCA] WD2XSH/10 Logged
>> >
>> >
>> > > Just before 1 AM tonight I heard this station on
>> 506 kHz. This is my
>> >first
>> > > 600M reception, so I'm happy with it. I sent in
>> a report to his email
>> > > address.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Dave Hochfelder
>> > > Highland Park, NJ
>> > > Drake R8B, Quantum Phaser, Kiwa Loop, Quantum QX
>> Pro Loop, copper pipe
>> > > loop,
>> > > and CB whip
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > IRCA mailing list
>> > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > >
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> > >
>> > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing
>> list are those of the
>> > > original contributors and do not necessarily
>> reflect the opinion of the
>> > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> > >
>> > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> > >
>> > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > >
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >IRCA mailing list
>> >IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> >
>> >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list
>> are those of the
>> >original contributors and do not necessarily
>> reflect the opinion of the
>> >IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> >
>> >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> >
>> >To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list
>> are those of the original contributors and do not
>> necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
>> editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx