[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IRCA] Fw: ARLP001 Propagation de K7RA
- Subject: [IRCA] Fw: ARLP001 Propagation de K7RA
- From: "Art Blair" <artngwen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:55:32 -0800
----- Original Message -----
From: "W1AW Mailing List" <w1aw-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <artngwen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <W1AW List:>
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 7:44 AM
Subject: ARLP001 Propagation de K7RA
> SB PROP @ ARL $ARLP001
> ARLP001 Propagation de K7RA
>
> ZCZC AP01
> QST de W1AW
> Propagation Forecast Bulletin 1 ARLP001
>>From Tad Cook, K7RA
> Seattle, WA January 5, 2007
> To all radio amateurs
>
> SB PROP ARL ARLP001
> ARLP001 Propagation de K7RA
>
> This is the first bulletin of 2007, the year we'll likely see the
> end of sunspot cycle 23, the beginning of cycle 24, and the minima
> between cycles.
>
> A few days now into this new year, we can look at sunspot and solar
> flux averages for 2006 compared with previous years.
>
> Average daily sunspot numbers for the years 1999 through 2006 were
> 136.3, 173, 170.3, 176.6, 109.2, 68.6, 48.9 and 26.1. Average daily
> solar flux for the same years was 153.7, 179.6, 181.6, 179.5, 129.2,
> 106.6, 91.9 and 79.9.
>
> The numbers above show a very clear decline, which is easier to
> perceive when the numbers are averaged over relatively long periods,
> such as a year. Looking at quarterly averages, we see a little more
> variability, but the same definite decline over time. Comparing
> those yearly numbers to a decade ago when the cycle was near the
> bottom, average daily sunspot numbers for 1995-1997 were 28.7, 13.2
> and 30.7.
>
>>From the first quarter of 2004 through the fourth quarter of 2006,
> the average daily sunspot number was 72.9, 71.3, 69.3, 61, 46.1,
> 55.7, 58, 36, 18.1, 39.7, 23.5 and 23.1.
>
> The average daily solar flux for the same period was 111.1, 99.5,
> 111, 104.8, 96.4, 93.1, 93.6, 84.5, 78.5, 82.1, 77.5 and 81.6.
>
> Recently this bulletin commented that the prediction for the low
> point between cycles had recently slipped out a couple of months, so
> instead of the low smoothed sunspot numbers predicted for March
> 2007, May looked more likely. Now a new forecast from NOAA has been
> released, and it shows a flat yet relatively high minimum for this
> year, spread out over many months. Take a look at page 9 of the
> Preliminary Report and Forecast for January 3, 2007 at,
> http://www.sec.noaa.gov/weekly/pdf/prf1635.pdf.
>
> Now compare that to just a month earlier, December 5, 2006, on page
> 11 at, http://www.sec.noaa.gov/weekly/pdf/prf1631.pdf. The one from
> last month shows the minimum centered around May 2007 with a
> smoothed sunspot number of 7, but the current issue shows a minimum
> smoothed sunspot number of 10 stretching from December 2006 through
> July 2007. Remember that the smoothed sunspot number for any month
> is the average of the monthly averages from five-and-a-half months
> before that month with five-and-a-half months after the month. So
> these are not just predicted sunspot numbers, but predicted smoothed
> sunspot numbers. In other words, the predicted smoothed sunspot
> number of 10 for December 2006 represents the average of December's
> daily numbers averaged with the months going back from the last half
> of June 2006 averaged with the predicted average monthly numbers
> through mid-June 2007.
>
> A similar prediction, found on the web at,
> http://sec.noaa.gov/ftpdir/weekly/Predict.txt, is updated weekly.
>
> Last week's bulletin mentioned an article in Space News on diverging
> predictions for the upcoming solar cycle, but we reported that the
> whole text of the piece is not available online. But Steve Sala,
> K7AWB of Nine Mile Falls, Washington sent us this link,
> http://www.space.com/spacenews/businessmonday_061218.html, which
> links to the entire article.
>
> The JAPY DX Group in Brazil has a VHF/UHF expedition for the first
> week of 2007 to Comprida Island (IOTA SA-024) through January 7.
> This is a 70 km long barrier island, part of the state of Sao Paulo,
> and the grid locator is GG64bx. This is around 25.028 degrees south
> latitude, 47.875 degrees west longitude. They are hoping to work
> trans-equatorial propagation into the Caribbean, and will be on SSB
> and CW on 50.11, 144.2 and 432.1 MHz, and FM on 144.54 and 433.1 MHz
> after 2200z daily using calls PY2OC, PY2ENO and PY2ZX.
>
> For the next few days, expect geomagnetic conditions to be from
> quiet to unsettled. Solar flux should stay around 90, and sunspot
> numbers below 50. Geophysical Institute Prague predicts unsettled
> conditions for today, January 5, quiet to unsettled January 6-7, and
> quiet conditions January 8-11.
>
> If you would like to make a comment or have a tip for our readers,
> email the author at, k7ra@xxxxxxxxx
>
> For more information concerning radio propagation, see the ARRL
> Technical Information Service at,
> http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/propagation.html. For a detailed
> explanation of the numbers used in this bulletin, see
> http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/k9la-prop.html. An archive of past
> propagation bulletins is at, http://www.arrl.org/w1aw/prop/ .
> Monthly propagation charts between four USA regions and twelve
> overseas locations are at, http://www.arrl.org/qst/propcharts/.
>
> Sunspot numbers for December 28 through January 3 were 0, 0, 11, 28,
> 28, 31 and 38 with a mean of 19.4. 10.7 cm flux was 76.3, 78.4, 80,
> 83.3, 86.9, 90, and 87.7, with a mean of 83.2. Estimated planetary A
> indices were 2, 2, 2, 0, 7, 19 and 20 with a mean of 7.4. Estimated
> mid-latitude A indices were 1, 1, 2, 1, 7, 12 and 11, with a mean of
> 5.
> NNNN
> /EX
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx