[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Info on 1610, 1020 and 590
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Info on 1610, 1020 and 590
- From: "Neil Kazaross" <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:26:00 -0600
Jim's map doesn't take into account Great Circle Path which matters when
several hundred miles away on an E-W bearing. I think the two lines coming
from near Chicago are the 104 and 107 (when I did a more accurate job ..with
trig etc) bearings I reported. 104 degrees from here is right at Baltimore
and 107 right at DC..while it is about 96 deg to coastal central Jersey...
73 KAZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "CHARLES HUTTON" <charlesh3@xxxxxxx>
To: <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Info on 1610, 1020 and 590
> Hey Neil -
>
> Looking at Jim Tonne's map, I'd say central NJ is right at the center of
> the
> reported DF's.
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>>From: "Neil Kazaross" <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Reply-To: Neil Kazaross <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mailing list for
>>the International Radio Club of America<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of
>>America"<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: Re: [IRCA] Info on 1610, 1020 and 590
>>Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 10:29:07 -0600
>>
>>Very interesting, Bob. Certainly could be testing for Cuban use. Anyhow,
>>the
>>bearings posted by most, do seem to be to far north for central NJ.
>>
>>73 KAZ
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Bob Foxworth" <rfoxwor1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America"
>><irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Cc: <ABDX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <am@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 10:03 AM
>>Subject: [IRCA] Info on 1610, 1020 and 590
>>
>>
>> >A posting on one of the BC lists within the hour states:
>> >
>> > 1610 was "legit and approved". 10 kW from an unspec east
>> > coast location. Content 1 kHz tone, nothing else (no hidden data etc).
>> >
>> > 1610 test is finished. Testing now on 1020, look tonight and
>> > Sat night. Then testing on 590 from Tue to Friday. Then, done.
>> >
>> > The purpose, authority or location was not given by the poster.
>> >
>> > I am sure more detail will be forthcoming.
>> >
>> > Some BC people are looking at Ft. Monmouth NJ (home of an
>> > Army communications command) as a possible site based on
>> > some DFing they did with FIM-41s.
>> >
>> > Finally some are speculating this is in preparation for the
>> > presumed coming demise of el maximo in order to have
>> > radio assets set to deploy.
>> >
>> > - Bob sent at 1103 est
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > No virus found in this incoming message.
>> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> > Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.3/561 - Release Date:
>>12/1/2006
>> >
>> >
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>IRCA mailing list
>>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>>IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.3/561 - Release Date: 12/1/2006
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx