Re: [IRCA] Broadcast Test Coordinator/QSL Manager?

["Bill Harms" <wharms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Why not?  DX Club ODXA does this something like this already for CHWO 
740 and CFRB 1010/CFRX 6070.  See the URLs below.

http://www.odxa.on.ca/chwo/reports.html

http://www.odxa.on.ca/cfrb/reports.html

Bill Harms


On 22 Sep 2006 at 12:37, Les Rayburn wrote:

> I'm following up now with as many past DX tests as I can, trying to arrange for QSL's
> to be sent either directly from the station or from my office (with the station's permission)
> 
> It has become clear already though that some tests were arranged by persons no longer
> employed at the station, and that this stations are either unable or unwilling to respond to
> the QSL requests. 
> 
> So here is what I propose (pending approval of the BoD and/or leadership)
> 
> Acting only as NRC/IRCA Broadcast Test Coordinator; past DX Tests
> would be verified with a QSL card created especially for this purpose. 
> 
> DX'ers wishing to receive verification of their reception could do so
> by submitting recordings and/or log details of the test. If the BTC 
> deems that he has enough accurate material of the test to successfully verify
> reception, then a QSL card would be sent to the member. The card
> would indicate that the signer has no affiliation directly with the station,
> and that verification is based solely on independent review of submitted
> materials (a disclaimer) 
> 
> As I see it, here are the pros and cons: 
> 
> Pros:
> 
> 1. DX'ers could receive verification of "dead" DX Tests from seasons past where
> there is little or no hope of receiving verification from the station. 
> 
> 2. Since my review process is much stricter than most stations, the cards
> should have "value" at least in terms of being authentic proof of reception. 
> I typically reject about 20% of all submitted reports. 
> 
> 3. For those tests where the BTC lacks sufficient log data and/or verified recordings
> of the tests, no QSL's would be given. 
> 
> 4. Since the card will be signed and verified by an NRC/IRCA member based
> solely on independent review, the card should have more "weight" than just
> a recording alone, at least for some. 
> 
> Cons: 
> 
> 1. Since the card does not originate from the station directly, many will view them
> as being less desirable. 
> 
> 2. The cards will not have station logo, or other trademarked identification...since we
> cannot use these without permission. In other words, the card will be fairly
> "generic". 
> 
> 3. As Broadcast Test Coordinators change over the years, the standards may
> shift, making the cards less valid. 
> 
> I'd like to hear the thoughts of DX'ers about this before making an official proposal
> to club leadership. Especially interested in non-club members reactions. Does getting
> a card signed by an NRC/IRCA Officer make it "almost as good" as a card from the station?
> 
> 73,
> 
> 
> 
> Les Rayburn, N1LF
> NRC/IRCA Broadcast Test Coordinator
> Please call anytime 24/7 if your transmitter
> will be off the air for maintenance. 
> (205) 253-4867



_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx