[IRCA] IBOC at night, u.s.w.; 20 2110Z MAR 06; PVZ
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[IRCA] IBOC at night, u.s.w.; 20 2110Z MAR 06; PVZ

Usual light 'n fluffy comments submitted to and blocked by BC board. Reason? Remarks constitute "invective". Why does CabalHD BLOC the truth?
 
The PC-Devils' Dictionary defines invective thusly: "Factual description of a grift in terms sufficiently vivid to disrupt flow of ill-gotten gains to BigCorpseorate pie-holes of avarice."
 
 The end? Not at all. Many people besides DX'ers listen to stations at night as well as those more than a few miles distant. They're quite savvy, contrary to monopolistic poltroons who mistake consumer kindness for stupidity.
 
 
This disingenuous kleptocratic jamming scheme will fail. CabalBOC knows it. It's why they're cheerleading is so frenetic. It's why they hire all manner of sock puppets to hard-sell this RF sludge-spreader to a public they've sorely underestimated.
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                        =Z.=
 
Paul Vincent Zecchino
Manavitriol Key, FL
BT
 
--- Begin Message ---
iBLOC is an ill conceived half-baked sloppily executed scheme to jam non-monopolykaster stations to ruin, deny citizens choice and yoke them to cabal-owned HD stations. HD was cagily promoted commencing with a fit of pique by a churlish boy-man politician adept at dissemblance but unwilling to answer questions honestly. HD/iBLOC is long-obsolete many times superseded by truly innovative technology.  
 
  HD promises quality sound and choices. It delivers noise and the same programs as analog albeit in lo-fi oatmeal-box audio via extortionately priced insensitive receivers. These are designed with such slovenly spectral contempt they not only jam adjacent analog receivers with their own insolent noise but themselves as well.
 
In manner of criminals working a scheme rather than honorable broadcasters, this peculiar syndicate orders engineers to 'make HD work' when clearly it never will as anything but a jammer. Ironically it blats harmful interference by several multiples of its pitifully limited useable range. Was this it's true 'make it look like something else' purpose?
 
Some or the more pernicious excuses for HD's fatal flaws serve as both admissions and illustrations of its underlying false premises:
 
1. iBLOC is our 'Inevitable Digital Future'. The Titanic was our inevitable transatlantic future.
    The iceberg had other thoughts. Listeners want 'compelling programs', not digital dross.
 
2. iBLOC is a 'politcial decision, we must implement it'. See "Nuremburg Defense'.
 
3. (My favorite) 'HD is not the problem, it's defective design of existing analog radios.'
 
    This is the Criminals' Retort expressed in elegant terms. By this logic, a physician
 
    can inject poison into patients resulting in death and avoid consequences by claiming the poison was benign.
 
    Instead, it was the patient's 'defective metabolism' which left them unable to assimilate toxic substances. Toxic - like HD's rotten noise.
 
 
Is Team iBLOC straight about anything? The initial bait was supposedly crystal clear audio. 'You can hear guys in the control room', as if that's why listeners listen. Real-world results - as opposed to iCLAQitty's cooked-book studies - demonstrate the opposite. Fidelity is disappointing, in polite terms.
 
What to do? Fix it? That would be inconsistent CabalHD history. Instead, shift focus to 'streaming, "Multicasting will wow them'.
 
Shell-game grifters are more credible than these monopolistic manipulators.
 
                                                                                                              =Z.=
 
Paul Vincent Zecchino
Manasoviet Key, FL
BT  
 
 

--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx