[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Another Boston Acoustics Receptor HD Radio Review
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Another Boston Acoustics Receptor HD Radio Review
- From: "CHARLES HUTTON" <charlesh3@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:57:46 +0000
There's a decent chance the codec does indeed try to plug the hole with the
last good sample or an extrapolation.
Lots of common audio codecs now do this, including the venerable G.711 of
telephone networks, G.729 of VoIP fame, G.728, etc. The usual trigger for
this is when the error correction sees a frame that is so bad it can't
correct it andthrows up its hands. It's then a simple matter to copy the
last good frame and apply any tailoring you wish.
I don't have direct knowledge of whether iBiquity is using this so-called
"error concealment".
End of engineering gobbledygook.
Chuck
>From: "Bob Foxworth" <rfoxwor1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of
>America<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <ABDX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mailing list for the International
>Radio Club of America"<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] Another Boston Acoustics Receptor HD Radio Review
>Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:50:46 -0500
>I have to go out on a limb and guess that one of the
>issues with static being a problem on AM is the
>possibility that long duration impulse noise, which
>is wide with respect to the digital bit stream, is
>punching holes in the digital data stream, and causing
>momentary dropouts. I have no idea how the receiver
>would behaves in this circumstance. I would guess
>that the impulse noise is somewhat stronger than the
>desired bit stream. I am pretty sure that the receiver
>is not sophisticated enough to replace the missing bit
>stream with an analogue of the recovered data that
>came just before it, and that which was cleanly decoded.
>
>
>- Bob
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx