[IRCA] Fw: ARLP002 Propagation de K7RA
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[IRCA] Fw: ARLP002 Propagation de K7RA



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "W1AW Mailing List" <w1aw-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <artngwen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <W1AW List:>
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:54 AM
Subject: ARLP002 Propagation de K7RA


> SB PROP @ ARL $ARLP002
> ARLP002 Propagation de K7RA
> 
> ZCZC AP02
> QST de W1AW  
> Propagation Forecast Bulletin 2  ARLP002
>>From Tad Cook, K7RA
> Seattle, WA  January 13, 2006
> To all radio amateurs 
> 
> SB PROP ARL ARLP002
> ARLP002 Propagation de K7RA
> 
> Geomagnetic conditions have been very, very quiet. This week has
> seen many periods when the K index, both planetary and mid-latitude,
> was 0 or 1. The average planetary/mid-latitude K index this week
> dropped from 5.4/5.1 (last week) to 3.3/3.4, respectively.
> 
> Of course, this low in the solar cycle, it is not surprising that
> sunspot numbers and solar flux dropped also. Average daily sunspot
> numbers dropped by 35 points from last week to 14.7, and solar flux
> was down 7.5 points to an average of 79.4.
> 
> Over the next week expect these conditions to stay the same, with
> possibly some slightly unsettled geo-activity on January 16.
> 
> Users of Canada's Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory data
> (such as me) were caught off-guard this week when our source of
> thrice-daily solar flux readings seemed to disappear from the net.
> 
> By Googling around and using a freeware program called Xenu Link
> Sleuth (a handy desktop web spidering application, which you can
> also find via a Google search) I finally discovered the new home of
> the Current Flux Archive. It now appears at
> http://www.drao-ofr.hia-iha.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/icarus/www/current.txt.
> The observatory's servers seem to have moved from drao.nrc.ca to the
> much longer domain shown in the URL.
> 
> More 10 meter mail arrived this week. Glenn Stewart, N7NRA of Mesa,
> Arizona reminds us to check for beacons between 28.2 and 28.3 MHz.
> Glenn says, "If you hear beacons, there is a very good likelihood
> that you can raise a PSK31 contact or two by calling CQ on PSK at
> 28.120. If you get lucky and find half a dozen or so PSK signals at
> 28.120, and if some of them are strong, head for 28.345 - 28.350 and
> call CQ on Phone. Chances are excellent that you'll raise a phone
> contact or two. The band's not dead. The problem is that everyone is
> listening. No one is calling CQ. Give it a try!"
> 
> Also in Arizona, and on 10 meters, is Hank Pfizenmayer, K7HP in
> Phoenix, about 15 miles northwest of N7NRA. He said that on December
> 26, 2005 on 10 meters from 2137-2220z he worked KP2L, KP4DKE, S9SS,
> MM0SLH, VE3FGU and ZL1BYZ. The next day he worked ZL2BSJ, ZL1BYZ and
> ZL3KR. He says, "I listen just about every day to the 10 meter
> beacons, usually a couple times at least, and it would be easier to
> list days that I do not hear a beacon somewhere. I have found I can
> call CQ on CW for long periods with no activity at all even though I
> am hearing beacons all over the east coast."
> 
> Bob Skaggs, KB5RX in Santa Fe, New Mexico says he has been listening
> to 17 meters later, and observed, "When local sunset occurs, the
> band goes dead within 5 minutes. From 10 over 9 to nothing in less
> than 7 minutes. Not like when the sunspot activity is high where the
> band slowly fades."
> 
> If you would like to make a comment or have a tip for our readers,
> email the author at, k7ra@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> For more information concerning radio propagation and an explanation
> of the numbers used in this bulletin see the ARRL Technical
> Information Service propagation page at,
> http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/propagation.html. An archive of past
> propagation bulletins is found at, http://www.arrl.org/w1aw/prop/.
> 
> Sunspot numbers for January 5 through 11 were 23, 24, 11, 11, 11, 11
> and 12 with a mean of 14.7. 10.7 cm flux was 83.4, 82, 79.2, 78.2,
> 77.6, 77.8, and 77.3, with a mean of 79.4. Estimated planetary A
> indices were 3, 6, 5, 4, 2, 1 and 2 with a mean of 3.3. Estimated
> mid-latitude A indices were 3, 6, 6, 5, 1, 2 and 1, with a mean of
> 3.4.
> NNNN
> /EX
> 
> 
>

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx