Re: [IRCA] Quantum phaser vs MFJ 1026

["Chuck Hutton" <charlesh3@xxxxxxx>]

I do, but have not measured the gain/loss. I'll stick it on some test
equipment some time soon and measure it. Regardless, it has so little loss
that it has never ever been an issue for me. The only negative thing I can
say about it is that my passive phaser can null an S9+40 signal to nothing
but the Quantum is some 20 or 30 dB short of that. (Again, I don't recall
that I have measured the Quantum null with test equipment.) I don't consider
that important at all for nulling nighttime signals since the ionosphere
will keep you from getting anywhere near that. I don't do MW DXing in the
daytime so don't care about the deepness of the nulls.


Chuck



-----Original Message-----
From: irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Patrick Martin
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 10:58 PM
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club ofAmerica
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Quantum phaser vs MFJ 1026

Chuck,

Do you have the Quantum Phaser? If so, Do you notice any loss in yours?

Thanks.

73,

Patrick

Patrick Martin
Home of the 2006 IRCA Convention
Seaside Oregon!

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx