[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Quantum phaser vs MFJ 1026
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Quantum phaser vs MFJ 1026
- From: "Chuck Hutton" <charlesh3@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:49:03 -0800
- Thread-index: AcYXKgjHDd3JUgO6RFC6NUERC2YADQACTR8A
Not really, Patrick. You just leave it in the A+B position and search for a
null just like with any other phaser. The "A" and "B" positions are there
for when you only want to use a single antenna and want to spare yourself
the trouble of using an antenna switch.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Patrick Martin
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 7:37 PM
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club ofAmerica
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Quantum phaser vs MFJ 1026
Chuck,
With the MFJ 1026, there is no switch to fool with. with the Quantum the
have to throw the switch to position A, then to position B, and then to
A+B.
In the case of my Quantum, there is a loss of 5-10 DB. There is none
with the MFJ.
73,
Patrick
Patrick Martin
Home of the 2006 IRCA Convention
Seaside Oregon!
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx