[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Quantum phaser vs MFJ 1026
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Quantum phaser vs MFJ 1026
- From: "W. Curt Deegan" <WWWR@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:15:38 -0500
Patrick,
I did a quick check, swapping an antenna from through the phaser, to direct
to the receiver, and did not see any noticeable difference. Nothing
sophisticated, just a quick swap on a fairly steady signal. Don't know
what to tell you. Maybe someone else has done more extensive measurements
and can offer their insight.
Curt
At 10:41 PM 1/11/2006, you wrote:
>Curt,
>
>I see what you mean. Maybe leaving in the A+B position, you can adjust
>the two antennas independantly. In that case it might be what I am used
>to with the MFJ with no switch. It is like the carousel switching the
>R8 had and a lot of the people did not like it. I got used to it and it
>was never an issue. I guess it is a personal thing. But the loss is an
>issue.
>
>73,
>
>Patrick
>
>Patrick Martin
>Home of the 2006 IRCA Convention
>Seaside Oregon!
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx