Re: [IRCA] Quantum phaser vs MFJ 1026

["W. Curt Deegan" <WWWR@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Craig,

I understand what you're saying.  It would have been nice if your unit had 
been working properly before you began modifying it, so a comparison could 
have been made.  From what you describe, yours was not.

Since you and Patrick just received your units and neither are getting the 
results of others, it might be some manufacturing problem underlies the 
experiences of you both.

It will be of great interest to hear what you and Gerry come up with.

Curt

At 03:57 PM 1/11/2006, you wrote:
> >I don't have the MFJ unit for comparison but I have been using the Quantum
> >Phaser for a while now and do not see the signal degradation you seem
> >to.
>(snip)
> >I would suggest contacting Gerry Thomas at Radio Plus+ Electronics about
> >these issues.  He is a MW DXer with a lot of experience, the designer of
> >the Quantum Phaser and very helpful.
>
>First off, I don't want to be seen as saying the Quantum is inherently 
>flawed.  There are a lot of DXers who are perfectly happy with it.  That 
>isn't my intent.
>
>What I am saying is that in my work, it has not performed at all.  When I 
>null something, the whole nearby band goes with it.  Even nulling on 1360 
>which has two roughly equal distant signals doesn't allow me to pick one 
>over the other.  This has persisted through a number of antenna 
>configurations such as widely spaced loops, inside loop vs. wire and more.
>
>I have disassembled the unit and intend to replace the parts I think may 
>be bad.  This isn't a complicated unit, there's only a handful of 
>parts.  I already have wound two transformers and have bought good quality 
>conductive plastic pots.  Switches are next, and I am replacing the zero 
>ohm jumpers with wire.  I also intend to change the layout to provide as 
>much antenna-to-antenna isolation as I possibly can get. Putting 
>everything on one board without shielding may not be the best thing.
>
>It isn't going back to Gerry.  It would be in a bag if it did.  What I'm 
>doing is trying to see just what I can do to make this circuit 
>architecture work at optimum performance, and I'll share my results with 
>Gerry and anyone else who wants.  I'm simply hot-rodding a piece of 
>equipment which is a time-honored DXer trait.
>
>I've used Dallas Lankford's work as a guide.  His unit is quite similar, 
>though he uses a transformer for post-phaser impedence matching.  Gerry 
>uses a FET stage.  I can't say which is better at this point.
>
>I still recommend the unit.  Too many people have had too great success 
>for me to do otherwise.
>
>Craig Healy
>Providence, RI


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx