Re: [IRCA] Coax Cable

[Mike Irizarry <michael.irizarry29@xxxxxxxxx>]

I use rg6 flooded for all my low band receive antennas. I usually get it
from dx engineering. I have had very good success with it in the midwest
buried and just on top of the soil. The flooded capability has mitigated
small rodent bites. Some of the antennas I use it with are: 4 square, k9ay,
beverage, bog, and dhdl.
Hope this helps. It is not cheap, however.

Mike

On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 10:06 PM Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Haven't seen any response to this, James, and am probably not going
> to be much help.
>
> I've just used RG58 variants for up to 100' in permanent
> installations around the yard, 10 to15 years in some cases.   One of
> them runs through about 70' of rigid PVC electrical conduit IPEX
> #032907 and is buried.   Mind you, I've heard that although such
> conduit will keep the groundwater away from the coax, water vapor
> will condense inside, leading to a wet interior anyway.   That coax
> still seems to work,so maybe it's dry...or maybe not.
>
> On DXpeditions, I've run over 500' of  RG58 coax to DKaz'es and such,
> and not suffered particularly.
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
>
> At 22:26 2019-01-27, James Niven wrote:
> >I am curious as to what type of coax everyone uses for DKAZ antennas and
> >also general international shortwave band listening dipoles?
> >
> >It's time to revamp my antennas and I want to use the right cable that
> will
> >last for a while.
> >
> >
> >
> >I have read that RG-8U is good for long runs of a 100 to 150 feet, and if
> I
> >was to bury my coax, which is the best pipe/conduit to use to bring my
> >cables into the shack?
> >
> >
> >
> >thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >James Niven
> >
> >Austin, Texas
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >IRCA mailing list
> >IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> >the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> >To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Nick Hall-Patch
> Victoria, BC
> Canada
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx