Re: [IRCA] WWV and WWVH to stick around for just a little bit longer

["Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>]

I can argue for possibly keeping WWVB for the clocks, watches and stuff..
but it often doesnt work in big cities with lots of noise. WWV and WWVH
serve no real purpose except a bunch of nostalgia and some propagation
checks for DX'ers. If WWV and WWVH goes.. and it saves some money..
.several million, I won't be sad.

Paul

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 12:05 PM Rick Dau <drummer1965us@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
> Good news for us as DXers who rely so much on WWV.  Sounds like it and
> WWVH have gotten a stay of execution.  But we'll eventually have to adjust
> to life without them.
>
>
>
> 73,
>
> Rick Dau
>
> South Omaha, Nebraska
>
> ________________________________
> From: ndblist@xxxxxxxxx <ndblist@xxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Bill Riches <
> bill.riches@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2018 3:47 PM
> To: ndb
> Subject: [ndblist] NIST Funding
>
>
> Funding for the US Department of Commerce, which includes NIST and WWV /
> WWVH / WWVB, was authorized through December 7th, 2018 as part of the
> Continuing Resolution component of the Defense / Education / HHS / Labor
> FY2019 funding bill that was approved by the House on September 26 and
> signed by President Trump yesterday, September 28th.
>
>
>
> This averted an end-of-Fiscal-year shutdown that had been mildly
> threatened in the past few months.
>
>
>
> This approach kicks the can down the road until December 7th -- it funds
> all agencies at the same levels they received in FY 2018 for all continuing
> activities -- which would include the time stations because there was no
> Congressional or Agency action to shut them down in FY18.
>
>
>
> This date could mean that no actions will be taken until after mid-term
> elections, though that's not known for a fact.
>
>
>
> Details on the bill as passed and signed:
> https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6157/text
>
>
>
> 73,
>
>
>
> Bill, WA2DVU
>
> Cape May
>
> _._,_._,_
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx