[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] WWFD 820 Becomes First All-Digital AM Station
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] WWFD 820 Becomes First All-Digital AM Station
- From: Brett Saylor <bds2@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 09:31:28 -0400
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=dtKCccPessNdHyiONqmK2VY9r4mlx6jOBx6Fu+mnKhc=; b=lGSgo/o/OWsS3KfpHhqBZ518eiTgkGM7l6CiIlYAdTXYZ9wqlE9QCPvHmk2V0RVC86 lV9rpOrKTaojkns/IUE2UWVDvX7zzxj7ZNn4QXuTMr5ANuEBzFtjX+s4n9V2l8k6BOBZ Rs19KJu1u0WMxy5/NtYt/O07DB1/fYLVEhseuJpD6PTFPDOwAudlXPXvmHlYUP1t/RAu vq21vT2c6mtWX12N0Az+NK8KSXklnU9F2qkJHobHlgocl6GMp/v3WWx5igVK7RHCscUX vURIXBXOG47it0L5V0hDxg0Q//dN6LTfo+LD/5WsQ69thrsFn1wSxbXwIM+IDv7HWeMp lxcg==
1500 WFED isn't on IBOC right now, and I don't recall it being on any time
recently. According to Barry's site it's been off since 2007.
I just checked my overnight recordings and 820 is solid IBOC hash from 815
to 825 kHz, from sunset to sunrise. I can get around most IBOC noise by
tuning the opposite LSB or USB but this covers the entire frequency. 820 is
now pretty useless as a nighttime frequency. Frederick is 100 miles from
here.
Brett Saylor
State College, PA
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Russ Johnson <radiok3pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Letâs hope so.
>
> I was unimpressed even with HD FM coverage. Too many drop outs.
>
> Is 1500 in DC still iboc?
>
> Russ Johnson
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jul 17, 2018, at 8:35 AM, Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > There will now be just digital hash where the AM signal would have been..
> > But the rush into this ignores some important points -
> >
> > 1. How many car radios are capable of receiving these transmissions ? My
> > understanding was that carmakers were reducing, not increasing the HD
> > capability as standard equipment because it hadn't caught on.
> > 2. How many listeners are driven off by the low range AM signal - which
> > will continue and perhaps be worse - and not by analog
> > 3. How many people actually listen on AM anyway and would this change
> them ?
> >
> > I predict this adventure will fail.
> >
> >
> > Russ Edmunds
> > 15 mi NW Phila
> > Grid FN20id
> > <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > AM: Modified Sony ICF2010's (3) barefoot w/whip
> > FM: Yamaha T-80 & T-85, each w/ Conrad RDS Decoder;
> > Onkyo T-450RDS; Tecsun PL-310 ( 4); Sony XDRS3HD;
> > modified Sony ICF2010's (2) w/APS9B @ 15';
> > modified Sony ICF2010 w/whip
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:37 PM, Les Rayburn <les@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hereâs some news that Iâm not sure how to feel about:
> >>
> >> https://news.radio-online.com/cgi-bin/rol.exe/headline_id=n35675
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 73,
> >>
> >> Les Rayburn, N1LF
> >> 121 Mayfair Park
> >> Maylene, AL 35114
> >> EM63nf
> >>
> >> Member WTFDA, IRCA, NRC. Former CPC Chairman for NRC & IRCA.
> >>
> >> Elad FDM-S2 SDR, AirSpy SDR2, SDRPlay RSP-2 Pro, Sony XDR-F1HD [XDR Guy
> >> Modified], Dennon TU-1500RD, Sangean HDT-1X, Ray Dees RDS Decoders,
> Korner
> >> 9.2 Antenna, FM-6 Antenna, Kitz Technologies KT-501 Pre-amps, Quantum
> >> Phaser, Wellbrook ALA1530 Loop, Wellbrook Flag, Clifton Labs Active
> Whip.
> >>
> >> âNothing but blues and Elvis, and somebody elseâs favorite songââ
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IRCA mailing list
> >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>
> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>
> >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx