Re: [IRCA] XHDATA D-808 FM-DXing Comparison with Tecsun PL-380

[Pete Taylor <ptdx@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Gary,

Thanks for your reviews on this new receiver. Having RDS is a big plus.

A suggestion. As you review and compare, please note whether the sets have the âline outâ feature since this is a big help (at least to me). Thanks.
 
Pete Taylor
Tacoma, WA
12225w 4719n
HQ180 & ICF2010
Kiwa aircore & Palomar loops
DX398, SRF-59 & M37V
Eton E100 + Tecsun PL-300/380






> On Jun 1, 2018, at 4:31 PM, Gary DeBock <d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> After receiving an inquiry from Mark Roberts concerning the new XHDATA D-808's FM-DXing sensitivity, I decided to run a detailed comparison with the Tecsun PL-380-- one of the Si4734 DSP chip models which gained top FM-DXing honors in the 2015 Ultralight Radio Shootout review. In my very mediocre Puyallup Valley location (surrounded by hills on 3 sides), I checked three FM fringe stations which have a reputation for being tough FM catches 
> 
> 
> The new XHDATA is a very sensitive performer on the FM band. In direct comparison with the PL-380 in outperformed the Tecsun in the reception of the low-powered 95.3 KGY in Olympia, WA, 100.3 CKQQ in Langley, BC, and 106.5 KWPZ in Lynden, WA. The D-808 had 95.3 KGY at a weak level, while the PL-380 had nothing at all. On 100.3 the D-808 had CKQQ at a good level (plus an UnID Spanish station under it) while the PL-380 had only CKQQ at a fair level. On 106.5 the D-808 had KWPZ at a good level, while the Tecsun had it at a fair level. FM selectivity was identical in the two models. The D-808 benefits greatly from its 26" (66cm) whip antenna, compared to the PL-380's 21.75" (55cm) antenna. In addition the D-808's RDS capability really augments the model's FM-DXing sensitivity, adding an extra dimension to the entire experience. FM-DXers can order with confidence!
> 
> 
> Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx