You specifically called names to anyone who thought HD
was a good idea. Quote: “And all arguments to contrary
are, false, misleading, deserving no reply.” Your words. Your
accusation. If I believe, ergo, I am a liar. Perhaps you amuse some with your drivel, but I was
always taught that clarity of _expression_ was to be desired over intentional
efforts to impress with assumed erudition. Your sidestep into HMOs and such is bizarre, to say
the least. Irrelevant. Returning to radio, you do nothing to debate (which
you say you cherish) the issues of compatibility with existing radios and
infrastructure and the need for analog radio to reinvent itself. 95% of all
Americans listen to terrestrial radio each week. It is not about content in
this context. It is about using a delivery system that is perceived as not
being antiquated. Analog is perceived as antiquated by the consumer. Clinging to old systems and models is not an option.
That is my opinion, and that of most leaders in the industry. From:
Milspec390@xxxxxxx [mailto:Milspec390@xxxxxxx] You wish to place words into my
mouth? Consider well kind counsel. Do so gingerly, best not at all. Neither undersigned nor
professionals in review note any such allegations made against you. My
writings reflect concerns and terms used by broadcasters upset
by HD's deleterious effects & Team IBOC's callous dismissal of
same - as you well know. Those in review do note
your publication of private information, including characterizing
undersigned as somehow at odds with government. Puzzling to local officials,
with whom undersigned enjoys good rapport. As surely you know, such
false descriptions can prove
troublesome for those so portrayed, given today's political
climate and spirit of malice and malingering with which they
were drawn. Having earlier decided against
apprising you, am so doing now, in light of your actions, in hope
you may act for the good. Your apparent dislike of others'
exercise of First Ammendment Rights seems curious in light of your
occupation. As published writer and radio personality,
many note I relish honest debaters, brook no quarter to those
disingenuous; steadfastly seeing thru to completion that which others
may unwisely initiate. I've been grifted by the
world's orchids, to quote an old friend. Twenty million dollars stolen by
90's cabal of lawyers, crooked HMO, smarmy day-care center for rich brat's
kids, and usual gang of long-lost & suddenly found
"relatives". So, you're offering to do what,
precisely? Whenever concerns are published
about 'relatives' - anonymous group of couple hundred people - same
two individuals long seen as complicit - tediously, predictably,
object. Why? What are they telling us about
themselves? With all due respect, they're hard
act to follow, given forgeries, obfuscation, two known murders, all
committed to satisfy appetite. Yes, that's my name atop building seen by
those negotiating Thurber's Avenue curve, I-95, Not
name of whom HMO claims it to be. Those seen as complicit behave much
as those denying stinky little noise problems. You say there's no masking? Really? How interesting. Paul Vincent Zecchino BT |
_______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx