Re: [IRCA] New CC Skywave SSB Model is Unchanged on MW Band

[Rob Keeney <rkeeneybbq@xxxxxxxxx>]

According to the owners manual, the unit has SSB fine tuning to 10Hz.

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:30 AM, Russ Johnson <radiok3pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 1 kHz resolution?  No SSB on MW?
>  In baseball terms thatâs a âswing and a miss!â
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:05 AM <d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > For those of you wondering if you should purchase the new CC Skywave SSB
> > Model (with the sky-high price of $169.99, temporarily being offered at
> > $149.99), please be advised that the new SSB capability is for the SW
> bands
> > only. Anyone purchasing this model hoping to use it to check transoceanic
> > DX carrier strength on the MW bands is going to be disappointed.
> >
> > During ocean cliff MW-DXpeditions an SSB spotting receiver is a very
> > effective tool to keep track of emerging DU-DX targets for Ultralight
> radio
> > and FSL antenna reception, and until now "Supercharged" ICF-2010
> portables
> > have been used for this purpose. I was curious whether the new CC Skywave
> > SSB model might be able to perform this function, but upon reviewing
> > C.Crane's operating manual for the model it was clear that the SSB
> function
> > is only for the SW band
> > https://www.ccrane.com/files/manual/RAD_CCRADIO_SKYWSSB/CC%
> 20Skywave%20SSB%20Instruction%20Manual.pdf
> >
> > Because of the high price of the new model C.Crane may find it a
> challenge
> > to sell these radios at the $169.99 list price, and until someone writes
> a
> > review I'm kind of curious how effective the SSB function will be on SW
> > without greater frequency resolution than the 1 kHz steps provided my the
> > main tuning control (although not curious enough to pay $149.99 plus
> > shipping to find out).
> >
> > 73 and Good DX,
> > Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx