[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Michigan DU's & KFMB San Diego, Aug 29
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Michigan DU's & KFMB San Diego, Aug 29
- From: Neil Kazaross <neilkaz58@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 10:21:36 -0500
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=EqyaMEy6cqIz4R1v2c1eh1Q9yPiCrHxyJv24JT30Xmc=; b=vKiXrAHzDcmuG5rUUOxkR4FWXhy3KLkHKebChtgPsvJYR+Go72xjccDFVpskuV7I3u Zu/hvvQDcTGlN7s9yaUULFt6FqKNupBRn/0QS9uoulgfASIcD3tC3ZTlnq/4AJI0i3xm BXfEz9JJwTWz06A9VUKmTZIu+Jfng4dRuDPzPfx1wNAXKy3P4uqoMM9e1YY4cYw/k/Um Y7dywrHalrruG4T5Q9Q/jQf00u7ngar/DJqadUNSROIIvR157zYf/l9KsjJbM/Te39KC bAaHtVjBEJ8HoIvgbceq3KrytHYJNwA7cub5tuiZkjPoZP5qBv9cI+HsALKAMK6uJf8n 80Lg==
Interesting on 1035, Tim. WNVR is murderous here but tomorrow they
shouldn't have day power on til 1130 (I hope). Carriers on 1035 here in the
past but nothing close to audio. Do you think Solomon Is. or NZ with that
freq?
73 KAZ
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Tim Tromp <kilokat7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks, Kaz
>
> This morning had 1034.998 with threshold audio near 1100 UTC TOH but tough
> going through WNVR's splatter. Faint music again heard on 1098 near TOH.
> Lots of lower band DU carriers again this morning but weaker than the
> previous morning. Hopefully you can set up soon to catch some of this
> fun. My DKAZ is down at the moment, so nothing to report here on upper
> band DU's (where the DKAZ does better). I'll probably have it set up again
> this weekend.
>
> 73,
> -Tim
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Neil Kazaross <neilkaz58@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > Good stuff Tim. I should soon be set up again to check DU's as well. Re:
> > 603 never more than a weak carrier here. Re: 693 carrier here but never
> > that strong and honestly too close to IBOC noise from WSCR.
> >
> > Re: 702. I've had a station mix with 2BL a couple of times before
> including
> > once last Oct when the carriers were even and audios mixed. I assumed NZ
> > but have never IDed it.
> >
> > Re:756 have had carrier, but too close to WBBM IBOC noise to pull out
> > marginal audio.
> >
> > Re:1098 I expect you'll get even better audio soon. Re:1017 it would be
> > nice to end the DU season with Tonga in both our log books. 73 KAZ
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:59 PM, <d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Tim,
> > >
> > > Based on the recent ocean coast DXpeditions I've included a few
> > > suggestions on your UnID-DU frequencies. Hope this proves useful!
> > >
> > > Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >
> > > From: "Tim Tromp" <kilokat7@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: "IRCA Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" <
> > > irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "abdx" <abdx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 7:44:27 PM
> > > Subject: [IRCA] Michigan DU's & KFMB San Diego, Aug 29
> > >
> > > Local sunrise: 1107 UTC
> > > Receiver: Perseus SDR
> > > Antenna: southwest phased BOGs
> > >
> > >
> > > <<< 603 unid with solid strong carrier at 1100 UTC and just a few dB
> shy
> > of
> > > producing audio but good enough to hold the sync AM lock on the
> Perseus.
> > > >>>
> > >
> > > At your Australia-favoring location this is likely 603-2RN in Nowra (
> //
> > > 576), but it could also be the 5 kW New Zealand Maori station Radio
> > Waatea.
> > > Waatea plays a lot of rhythmic music, while the ABC RN network is
> usually
> > > talk (but with some exotic music at times). The two were fighting it
> out
> > > during Australia-favored propagation at Rockwork 4 on August 4th of
> this
> > > month, with 2RN dominant https://app.box.com/s/
> > > i3mgrjxw0dwadrtc2c69x7f2f7h6qzua
> > >
> > > 693 unid with another solid carrier at 1100 UTC, again just not enough
> to
> > > punch any audio through but one to watch in the future.
> > >
> > > <<< 701.999 unid with threshold music, no pips, no ABC fanfare heard at
> > > TOH, so
> > > maybe something other than Sydney? Song ends at 1101 UTC and then male
> > > announcer. Lost to 700 splash soon after. 701.996 shows a strong
> carrier
> > > later, at 1122 UTC, whom I think belongs to 2BL Sydney. >>>
> > >
> > > Almost certainly the 10 kW oldies broadcaster 702-Magic in Auckland,
> NZ.
> > > It mixes frequently with 2BL on the coast. The TOH ID is "Magic-- feels
> > > good" like at 55 seconds into the recording at https://app.box.com/s/
> > > 1kmy738awm8pl70ht0vmsm6rrvswijb6
> > >
> > >
> > > <<< 756 unid with solid carrier for several minutes at 1053 UTC and
> > > threshold
> > > audio but far too weak to make anything out. Blown out of the ocean at
> > > 1100 UTC when WNDZ signs on the air. >>>
> > >
> > > Likely 756-RNZ in New Zealand, one of the strongest RNZ frequencies on
> > the
> > > coast, and // 567 and 675 https://app.box.com/s/
> > > anomc4qcr64ezmoe8aykin4podyah1w7
> > >
> > > <<< 1017 had a "near audio" carrier at 1057 UTC. >>>
> > >
> > > Tonga is much stronger than any other DU on the frequency, so as long
> as
> > > you have a decent carrier on 1017 in the Midwest it's most likely Tonga
> > > https://app.box.com/s/zjc64srpsqz6xplxlr2v8o2i667qrvrc
> > >
> > > 1098 probably Marshalls with very faint music during a rare moment of
> > > minimum 1090 splash. This was at 1052 UTC. Music, though not
> identifiable
> > > to my ears, was probably good enough to make a parallel confirmation
> if I
> > > had been DXing live at the time. Best audio so far from 1098 and
> > > encouraging.
> > >
> > >
> > > Weaker DU carriers also noted on many of the lower 9 kHz channels this
> > > morning.
> > >
> > >
> > > Domestic notes:
> > >
> > > 760 KFMB San Diego continues to be heard here every morning at sunrise
> > > under WJR. This could be a good time to log them from the Midwest if
> you
> > > need them.
> > >
> > > 73,
> > > Tim Tromp
> > > West Michigan
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IRCA mailing list
> > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >
> > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >
> > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IRCA mailing list
> > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >
> > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >
> > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx