[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Michigan DU's & new domestic logged, Aug 26



Keep after them, Mark. I know you can get them eventually with that
antenna.  73 KAZ

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Mark Mobile <Mark4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Pretty nice carrier on 1098 at 1100 this morning...D-Kaz at 330 degrees.
>
>
> Cheers!
>
> Mark Durenberger, central Minnesota
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Neil Kazaross
> Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2017 9:13 PM
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
> Cc: abdx
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Michigan DU's & new domestic logged, Aug 26
>
> Good luck, Tim. Also you may want to try your N DKAZ for 1098 as I think
> the bearing to that is about 285 deg and perhaps you'll have less QRM.
>
> I have just a bit more tree work way overhead (I stand in back of pickup
> truck and use an extendable pruner) and then I should have the wire taught
> for my new antenna tests. If this works as modelled there will be 7 dB more
> signal (crucial for low end DU's) than I get out of a DKAZ taking up the
> same space, while maintaining just about the same pattern and fine back
> nulls. If it doesn't work, then it is quickly back to DKAZ here.
>
> 73 KAZ 35 miles NW of Chicago's Willis Tower
>
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Tim Tromp <kilokat7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Kaz.  KPET was a very nice surprise and one I wasn't expecting but
>> will gladly take.  Conditions were hot this morning towards the west. I'll
>> be at it again tomorrow morning (so much for sleeping in this weekend).
>> I'm looking forward to your logs this season, which has apparently begun
>> here now!  Thanks also for the reminder about the 1017 & 1098 sign-off
>> times.  Indeed, the 1017 carrier seemed gone shortly after 1100 UTC.
>>
>> 73,
>> -Tim
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Neil Kazaross <neilkaz58@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Very promising indeed, Tim and a good inducement for me to get out into
>> the
>> > field and finish up my west antenna (assuming it works). Good catch with
>> > KPET 690, I need that one. Sd/lk you had Marshall Is. on 1098 to me. >
>> More
>> > listening should give you something more positive soon. Note they start
>> > s/off somewhat prior to 1130 and leave OC on. Re:1017 (still needed
>> here) I
>> > think s/off starts at about 1100 and ends 1103.
>> >
>> > 73 KAZ
>> >
>> > On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Tim Tromp <kilokat7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I connected up my southwest phased BOGs last night and woke up early
>> for
>> > a
>> > > little sunrise DX to gauge DU conditions, since after all, it's that
>> time
>> > > of year again here when DU's can make their presence known in > >
>> Michigan.
>> > > Expecting nothing more than a few weak carriers to kick off the
>> season, I
>> > > was pleasantly surprised with weak audio on several channels.  These
>> logs
>> > > all revolve around local sunrise time here, which was 11:03 UTC
>> Aug.26th,
>> > > 2017, times below are UTC.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 612 4QR ABC Brisbane with weak audio, easy enough to tell it's rugby
>> > > play-by-play with Aussie accents.  11:03 and now domestics have faded
>> way
>> > > down on 610 making 4QR easier to copy.  In with weak audio for a solid
>> > ten
>> > > minutes or so after sunrise. Carrier hung on until about 11:20.  8,993
>> > > miles from TX to RX.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 702 2BL ABC Sydney getting past heavy KHSE splatter that eventually
>> fades
>> > > down at 11:03.  Now fast paced rugby play-by-play lasting for several
>> > > minutes and a bit stronger than 612. No idea if this was // to 612 as
>> > > I
>> > > couldn't catch simultaneous audio peaks between channels.  Carrier
>> still
>> > > noted at 11:23.  9,345 miles from TX to RX.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 738 2NR ABC North Coast in heavy splash from 730 with // 702 rugby
>> > > coverage, peaking at audio at 11:03 but only lasting a couple of
>> minutes.
>> > >  9,073 miles from TX to RX.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 1098 for the first time here was more than just an open carrier!  Slow
>> > > relaxing music first noted around 10:45 and continued up to the top of
>> > the
>> > > hour and then talk but too weak to comprehend.  Marshall Islands, I
>> would
>> > > assume?  Unfortunately I couldn't parallel it against anything else >
>> > for
>> > > confirmation.  Their streaming site wasn't working for me.  Another
>> brief
>> > > signal peak at 11:10 but then faded rapidly.  First time catching any
>> > kind
>> > > of audio here on 1098.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > DU carriers also noted on: 531, 549, 558, 576, 594 (strong), 603, 621,
>> > 639,
>> > > 648, 693 (strong), 729, 747, 756, 828, 837, 882 (strong), 891, 1017
>> > > (strong), 1035 & 1116.
>> > >
>> > > Noteworthy North Americans heard at 11:00 TOH:
>> > >
>> > > 570 KLZ Denver, CO.
>> > > 600 KCOL Wellington, CO.
>> > > 640 KFI Los Angeles, CA.
>> > > 650 XETNT Los Mochis, SIN
>> > > 680 KNBR San Francisco, CA.
>> > > 690 KPET Lamesa, TX. - 250w @ 1,120 miles - "Real Country" -  NEW LOG!
>> > > 700 KHSE Wylie, TX. (huge signal)
>> > > 760 XEABC & KFMB San Diego, CA. (tent w/ Red Eye Radio, CBS network
>> news
>> > &
>> > > infomercial after 11:00 TOH)
>> > > 890 KJME Fountain, CO.
>> > > 1020 KCKN Roswell, NM.
>> > > 1070 KNX Los Angeles, CA.
>> > >
>> > > 73,
>> > > Tim Tromp
>> > > West Michigan
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > IRCA mailing list
>> > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> > >
>> > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of >
>> > the
>> > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> > >
>> > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> > >
>> > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > >
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > IRCA mailing list
>> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> >
>> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> >
>> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> >
>> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx