[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] AFCCE Wants Pai to Address RF Noise, AM Synchronous Boosters
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] AFCCE Wants Pai to Address RF Noise, AM Synchronous Boosters
- From: Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 18:16:03 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: hard-core-dx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; hard-core-dx.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=bcdx.us;
- Content-language: en-US
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rotaryvision.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-bcdx-us; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=4iwweWEqVDag+C6d/BbzLBlYfjidsOI25GrYBpznvOs=; b=wkLBqyo76gUnsaYG1wew4Io0ozJRQrJbXAMLPt+eYdRIuMOrCtsvOs+yAagk2ZcfPhr38M7dlPaYuQIXtWv8nssMR7b+hZBtaz4QOMifVK7tcVlRMFhytv55tsenYGfodSfJl3zuoTLg0saxarbipsrxrXdfU0B+6/n8KEXAoAg=
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
- Thread-index: AQHS1LJj3hapUWGUzEq/Ub1KEBsy9qIDw0QAgAAGad0=
- Thread-topic: [IRCA] AFCCE Wants Pai to Address RF Noise, AM Synchronous Boosters
There's not much in the way of context here, but I think it would be a stretch to presume that the government inspects/tests each-and-every item. The problem is that they approve a "type" of product, and often that's that. It isn't clear here whether or not these products in fact even met the type that had been approved.
Russ Edmunds
WB2BJH
Blue Bell, PA
Grid FN20id
________________________________
From: IRCA <irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of billy brooks <wwbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 1:51:12 PM
To: 'Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America'
Subject: Re: [IRCA] AFCCE Wants Pai to Address RF Noise, AM Synchronous Boosters
I seldom comment on political issues because of my libertarian stance.
However, the gov. ought to put its own house in order first. Their "energy
star" boondoggle
Is just that. Their testing is highly specious and what they tout is largely
sent from "greased palms". Even the iconic "sae" and underwriters labs have
questionable testing.
My point is, if the gov. once approves something, they should refrain from
punitive actions down the road against those entities submitting.
-----Original Message-----
From: IRCA [mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dennis Gibson
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 1:23 PM
To: Mailing List for the International Radio Club of America
Subject: [IRCA] AFCCE Wants Pai to Address RF Noise, AM Synchronous Boosters
http://www.radiomagonline.com/fcc/0019/afcce-wants-pai-to-address-rf-noise-a
m-synchronous-boosters/38921
Sent from my iPad
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx