Re: [IRCA] 1053 Korea (all) off the air

["R. Colin Newell" <coffeecanuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

I have been tuning the Japanese WebSDR's for weeks now -- no sign of any jamming on 1053. 

Colin Newell - CoffeeCrew.com - VA7WWV - Victoria - BC

> On Mar 25, 2017, at 8:55 AM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> OK Chris.    1053 was in this morning with music here, but I'll need to check the recording to see if there was any talk, and to maybe snag the offset(s) if I can.   But the few times I've heard anything, it's sounded Japanese, and the rest of the band conditions at the time have been Japanese.   Plus, this morning, the carrier didn't sound outrageously loud compared with the audio.
> 
> best wishes,
> 
> Nick
> 
> 
> At 08:04 25-03-17, Chris Kadlec wrote:
>> It is my understand that the frequency is empty aside from Yanbian during skywave. My sources in Seoul tell me that Haeju is off entirely - if there were an open carrier 60 miles away at 1,500kw, it would be very much noticed. As long as Haeju is off, Seoul and Gimpo have no reason to function at all. Yanbian is pretty powerful and would usually come in strong in the absence of the other stations (when the jammers started turning off after 11:30pm instead of going 24 hours like they used to). They're probably your carrier if you see one, at least if you're talking East Asia. I personally never heard anything else on 1053.
>> 
>> -Chris
>> 
>> 
>>> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 04:14:42 +0000
>>> From: Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
>>> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
>>> <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] 1053 Korea (all) off the air
>>> 
>>> Thanks Chris; I suspected that might be the case, as the beehive
>>> jammer had been so regular here  before 1400UT.
>>> 
>>> But...has anyone left a carrier on?   I'm not hearing much audio here
>>> (and usually it sounds like Japan if I do), but unless JOAR is really
>>> undermodulated, someone still is putting out a good carrier.
>>> 
>>> best wishes,
>>> 
>>> Nick
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> 
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> 
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> 
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Nick Hall-Patch
> Victoria, BC
> Canada 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx