Re: [IRCA] Oklahoma TP DX 3/21/17

[Dennis Gibson <wb6tnb@xxxxxxxxx>]

What's your definition of old school?

Sent from my iPad

> On Mar 22, 2017, at 12:33 AM, Todd S <amdxing1976@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> WTAM does get out well,like WSM. Does WTAM still have a old school antenna?
> 
> 
> Todd Skaine
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:55 AM Richard N Allen <richarda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
>> Neil:
>> 
>> I feel your carrier on 747 was probably JOIB.  Although there is a
>> possibility it was 4QS, Toowoomba.
>> 
>> Too bad you have can't hear JOUB 774 as it's the most reliable TP here.  I
>> often joke it's my local NHK outlet
>> 
>> I agree about V7AB.  I'm always surprised how well WTAM is heard here.
>> 
>> I haven't tried to hear the X-band Aussies.  I guess I need to give it a
>> try using the R75 and ALA1530LNP.
>> 
>> Good DX.
>> 
>> Richard.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>>> On Mar 21, 2017, at 09:38, Neil Kazaross <neilkaz58@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Here from IL at SR. Weak carrier on 747 not sure if from Japan or Aussie..
>>> Weak slopped audio on 1548 barely heard. Yesterday was lots better and
>>> yesterday's peak signal from 4QD was about 15 dB better than today!
>>> 
>>> Unfortunately, 774 is ruined by WBBM here and even a 30dB+ tweaked
>> Vactrol
>>> back null isn't close to enough.
>>> 
>>> V7AB 1098 would be logged by quite a few others if it stayed on past 1130
>>> so people could wait for SR to take out WTAM.
>>> 
>>> Of interest here the past couple of mornings is a reasonable carrier on
>>> 1701.09. I can always dream about logging Brisvani is much better cx.
>>> 
>>> 73 KAZ
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> 
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> 
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> 
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx