[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 12-6
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 12-6
- From: Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 18:04:38 +0000
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8SfqO5pEOQm2/buGdcjlNBa6Jxi60f0c0VcTGZYrlgs=; b=oQWsgGexckXWzYnft1j9MSYr0ZygKi1JuthrHpqS+hcQYjCv17E5PKv37NyM+DFqxo pwB8E+mLs/+bNl+jJ8fZsLuOJHa8H+gaqMh8LBc3jPlLU9Q4oJaPq8VcJIv2nacuL9sc ePDTGtI8qh9/ghA+5y7JYzrH5Ihafl0nALIfGJEAZF4ajeo7ppeqp7jIwySr5aIKg8+t lEcyB3KcEDFzEVoLpu6YdKdTo1EWkjta/1L3e0jDVrMO8iUliIsavs+ML9DKAJsDH/02 ucaJjR4dcFVpfpg+B27Ekx0cyKIoUbAWPVifu5iHBNzF0hT3+29xFYfWo8YBo2R1ZYGa OdUg==
You may be correct, Nick. As you know, my ALA is located in the big willow
over our garage, and closest to the neighbour's hot tub/heater, etc.
Hmm....Walt
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Your experience with the ALA100 loop is intriguing to me, Walt. I wonder
> if it's the placement of it relative to noise sources?
>
> I've almost always found the Flags to be a noisier antenna than the ALA100
> loop, but the directionality of the Flags (sometimes incidentally nulling
> out the noise as well as the domestics, sometimes not) make them the go-to
> antenna for overseas DX at this location. Fortunately, domestic splash
> rather than local electrical noise is still usually the dominant source of
> interference here.
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
>
> At 17:15 06-12-16, Walter Salmaniw wrote:
>
>> Coliin, as I have the ALA loop up all of the time, along with my 2 super
>> loops, I can categorically state that the loops (and Pennants/Flags, I'm
>> sure), blow away the ALA loop. The ALA loop is a great all around
>> compromise antenna, working nicely from LW to the top of the SW band.
>> That's why I have it. For TA/TP work, however, my super loops are much,
>> much better, and quieter, too. 73,...Walt
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:23 PM, R. Colin Newell <coffeecanuck@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > My Delta ALA100 did not produce anything as colourful as Nick's
>> Fishbarrel
>> > -- there might have been wispy audio on 774 --
>> > unlike yesterday with good audio on 1566.
>> >
>> > Snow in Victoria this AM and temps at 28F or -3 C -- that would be
>> Spring
>> > weather in Galena
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 7:59 AM, <d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > > After a comatose predawn band check a couple of diehard Asians
>> actually
>> > > managed some ghostly audio this morning at peak dawn enhancement. The
>> > > meager TP propagation was all on the low band as 594-JOAK hit some
>> poor
>> > to
>> > > fair peaks around 1500, and 747-JOIB did the same around 1505. 693,
>> 774
>> > and
>> > > 828 only showed up with anemic carriers, while the usual Koreans on
>> 972,
>> > > 1053 and 1566 couldn't even manage that. Such was the story of a
>> pretty
>> > > dreary morning.
>> > >
>> > > 73 and Good DX,
>> > > Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
>> > > 7.5" loopstick C.Crane Skywave Ultralight +
>> > > 15" FSL antenna
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Colin Newell - Editor and creator *of *Coffeecrew.com
>> > <http://www.Coffeecrew.com> and DXer.ca <http://www.DXer.ca> -
>> > VA7WWV | Twitter @CoffeeCrew | Victoria - Canada
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > IRCA mailing list
>> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> >
>> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> >
>> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> >
>> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>
> Nick Hall-Patch
> Victoria, BC
>
> Canada
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx